首页> 外文OA文献 >MNC Organizational Form and Subsidiary Motivation Problems: Controlling Intervention Hazards in the Network MNC
【2h】

MNC Organizational Form and Subsidiary Motivation Problems: Controlling Intervention Hazards in the Network MNC

机译:跨国公司的组织形式和附属动机问题:控制网络跨国公司中的干预危险

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The MNC literature treats the (parent) HQ as entirely benevolent with respect to their perceived and actual intentions when they intervene at lower levels of the MNC. However, HQ may intervene in subsidiaries in ways that demotivate subsidiary employees and managers (and therefore harm value-creation). This may happen even if such intervention is benevolent in its intentions. We argue that the movement away from more traditional hierarchical forms of the MNC and towards network MNCs placed in more dynamic environments gives rise to more occasions for potentially harmful intervention by HQ. Network MNCs should therefore be particularly careful to anticipate and take precautions against "intervention hazards". Following earlier research, we point to the role of normative integration and procedural justice, but argue that they also serve to control harmful HQ intervention (and not just subsidiary opportunism). (authors' abstract)
机译:MNC文献在较低级别的MNC进行干预时,将(父母)总部视为对他们的感知和实际意图完全仁慈。但是,总部可能以破坏子公司员工和经理的方式干预子公司(从而损害价值创造)。即使这种干预在其意图上是仁慈的,也可能发生这种情况。我们认为,从更传统的MNC分层形式向放置在动态环境中的网络MNC转移的趋势,导致总部提出更多可能有害干预的机会。因此,网络跨国公司应格外小心,以防“干预危险”并采取预防措施。在进行了较早的研究之后,我们指出了规范性整合和程序正义的作用,但他们认为它们还可以用来控制有害的总部干预(而不仅仅是附属的机会主义)。 (作者摘要)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号