首页> 外文OA文献 >A Comparison Study between RCCAR and Conventional Prediction Techniques for Resolving Context Conflicts in Pervasive Context-Aware Systems
【2h】

A Comparison Study between RCCAR and Conventional Prediction Techniques for Resolving Context Conflicts in Pervasive Context-Aware Systems

机译:解决普适上下文感知系统中上下文冲突的RCCAR与常规预测技术的比较研究

摘要

In Pervasive computing environment, context-aware systems face many challenges to keep high quality performance. One-challenge faces context-aware systems is conflicted values come from different sensors because of different reasons. These conflicts affect the quality of context and as a result the quality of service as a whole. This paper is extension to our previous work, which is published in [15]. In our previous work, we presented an approach for resolving context conflicts in context-aware systems. This approach is could RCCAR (Resolving Context Conflicts Using Association Rules). RCCAR is implemented and verified well in [15], this paper conducts further experiments to explore the performance of RCCAR in comparison with the traditional prediction methods. The basic prediction methods that have been tested include simple moving average, weighted moving average, single exponential smoothing, double exponential smoothing, and ARMA. Experiments is conducted using Weka 3.7.7 and Excel; the results show better achievements for RCCAR against the conventional prediction methods. More researches are recommended to eliminate the cost of RCCAR.
机译:在普适计算环境中,上下文感知系统在保持高质量性能方面面临许多挑战。面临环境感知的系统面临的挑战之一是,由于不同的原因,来自不同传感器的值冲突。这些冲突影响上下文的质量,从而影响整个服务的质量。本文是对我们先前工作的扩展,该工作发表于[15]。在我们之前的工作中,我们提出了一种解决上下文感知系统中上下文冲突的方法。这种方法可以是RCCAR(使用关联规则解决上下文冲突)。 RCCAR在[15]中得到了很好的实施和验证,与传统的预测方法相比,本文进行了进一步的实验来探索RCCAR的性能。已测试的基本预测方法包括简单移动平均,加权移动平均,单指数平滑,双指数平滑和ARMA。使用Weka 3.7.7和Excel进行实验;结果表明,相对于传统的预测方法,RCCAR具有更好的效果。建议进行更多研究以消除RCCAR的成本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号