首页> 外文OA文献 >The Democratic Life of the Union: Toward Equal Voting Participation for Europeans with Disabilities
【2h】

The Democratic Life of the Union: Toward Equal Voting Participation for Europeans with Disabilities

机译:联盟的民主生活:争取欧洲残疾人平等的投票参与

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This Article puts forward preliminary legal scholarship on equal political participation by persons with disabilities and what international human rights law requires for its attainment. The goal is to provoke an informed dialogue on the neglected but fundamental human right to enfranchisement by persons with disabilities while also acknowledging that a complete and just resolution requires further information and reflection.The Article argues that the fundamental right to vote cannot be curtailed on the basis of an alleged lack of capacity. Disenfranchisement based on individual assessment unjustly excludes a certain number of voting-capable individuals. Since all those affected are persons with disabilities, this violates the requirement of equality expressed in general international human rights law that recently was explicitly extended to cover disability.The Article also pushes the discussion forward by delving into the controversial and unsettling notion of proxy voting, suggested by philosopher Martha Nussbaum. Although a small number of individuals cannot currently be accommodated in the electoral process, this does not justify their disenfranchisement. Nor does it warrant a more intrusive measure, such as voting by proxy. In no circumstance should their situation justify singling out voting-incapable persons from other individuals or categorizing them differently before the law.Although the focus is often seen through a European lens, the questions raised are pertinent for the exercise of human rights by persons with disabilities around the globe.
机译:本条就残疾人的平等政治参与以及实现国际人权法的要求提出了初步的法律奖学金。目的是就残疾人被忽视但基本的人权发动知情的对话,同时承认完整和公正的解决方案需要进一步的信息和反思。该条认为,基本投票权不能在残疾人权利上受到限制。所谓的能力不足的依据。基于个人评估的剥夺公民权不公正地排除了一定数量的具有投票权的个人。由于所有受影响的人都是残疾人,因此这违反了国际人权法中最近明确涉及平等的平等要求。该条款还通过探讨有争议和令人不安的代理投票概念来推动讨论,由哲学家玛莎·努斯鲍姆(Martha Nussbaum)提出。尽管目前无法在选举过程中容纳少量个人,但这并不能证明他们被剥夺了选举权。它也不保证采取更具干扰性的措施,例如通过代理投票。在任何情况下,他们的处境都不能证明将有投票权的人从其他人中分离出来或在法律面前对他们进行不同的分类。尽管人们通常从欧洲的角度来看待焦点,但提出的问题与残疾人行使人权有关在全球范围内。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号