首页> 外文OA文献 >Income distribution, growth and social-welfare: towards an economic solution to the growth-equality trade-off problem
【2h】

Income distribution, growth and social-welfare: towards an economic solution to the growth-equality trade-off problem

机译:收入分配,增长和社会福利:寻求经济增长解决增长平等权衡问题的方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This thesis assesses the social-welfare implications of modifications to the post transfer distribution of income, in the context of welfare maximising policy design. Both the inequality-distributional efficiency and inequality-growth relationship are assessed. An Atkinson social welfare function is employed in a novel fashion to model the inequality distributional efficiency relationship, including direct effects that result from the concavity of the personal utility function, and external losses operating via positional income effects. This analysis produces estimates of the social welfare losses from inequality across a data set of 137 countries, where the unweighted average of total losses is found to be equivalent to be 47% of GNI. The equality-growth relationship is analysed from the standpoint of both endogenous growth theory and post-Keynesian theories of demand and investment. The relationships between the functional and personal distribution of income and key macroeconomic variables including the rate of savings, and physical and human capital accumulation are assessed. Crucially, these relationships are found to be highly modifiable by economic policy and structural reform, and in theory, no growth–equality trade off need exist. On the contrary, equality may be growth promoting at moderate to high inequality levels. Combined with the large static welfare losses from inequality uncovered in this analysis, the welfare optimum level of inequality is likely to be close to the level associated with distributional efficiency maximisation. This is likely to be a very low level of inequality in comparison to existing levels in most countries and regions, and large welfare losses result from levels of inequality significantly above this level.udHonours Thesis: Submitted as partial requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Arts (Honours), Political Economy, University of Sydney, 2011.ud2udThis work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, this thesis contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due references is made in the text of the thesis.
机译:本文在福利最大化政策设计的背景下,评估了修改收入转移后分配的社会福利意义。不平等分配效率和不平等增长关系都得到了评估。阿特金森社会福利函数以一种新颖的方式被用来对不平等分配效率关系进行建模,包括由个人效用函数的凹面产生的直接影响,以及通过位置收入效应而产生的外部损失。该分析得出了来自137个国家的数据集中因不平等而导致的社会福利损失的估计值,在这些国家中,总损失的未加权平均值等于GNI的47%。从内生增长理论和后凯恩斯主义的需求与投资理论的角度分析了平等-增长关系。评估了收入的功能和个人分配与关键的宏观经济变量(包括储蓄率)以及实物和人力资本积累之间的关系。至关重要的是,这些关系被经济政策和结构改革高度修改,并且从理论上讲,不存在需要进行增长与平等权衡的情况。相反,平等可能在中等至高度不平等水平上促进增长。结合本分析中发现的因不平等而造成的大量静态福利损失,福利的不平等最佳水平可能接近与分配效率最大化相关的水平。与大多数国家和地区的现有水平相比,这可能是一个非常低的不平等水平,而巨大的福利损失是由于不平等水平明显高于该水平而造成的。 udHonours Thesis:作为对本科学历的部分要求悉尼大学政治经济学艺术(荣誉学位),2011年。论文不包含先前由他人出版或撰写的材料,除非在论文正文中适当提及。

著录项

  • 作者

    Latty Kieran;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_AU
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号