首页> 外文OA文献 >European Disunion? Social and Economic Divergence in Europe, and their Political Consequences
【2h】

European Disunion? Social and Economic Divergence in Europe, and their Political Consequences

机译:欧洲联盟?欧洲的社会和经济分歧及其政治后果

摘要

The principal component of a European social model was considered to be convergence of social outcomes toward the top. However, the latest economic and social trends are no longer characterized by a steady narrowing of the gap between the more and lesser advanced countries. While all European countries were affected by the economic crisis of 2008 and a coordinated response was put into place in 2009, since 2010, we see a growing divergence between two groups of countries in Europe. The first group, mainly in the North of Europe, concentrated around Germany, Austria, the Nordic countries, along with certain Eastern European countries having close economic ties to Germany, has steadily emerged from the crisis and resumed a positive economic and social path. The second group, however, comprised mainly of the Southern and Eastern periphery, remains stuck in negative economic and social situations following the crisis. This chapter demonstrates the initial economic convergence, followed by a stark divergence in certain economic and social outcomes after the crisis of 2008. It reviews the various explanations for these divergences. Finally, it considers the political outcomes of this economic and social dualization. We argue that despite the seemingly uniform rise of populist anti-EU challengers across Europe, these challengers differ significantly in the grievances they raise. Radical right parties are dominant in the center, while radical left parties outperform the radical right in the periphery, a dynamic that constitutes a second, political, dualization of Europe.
机译:欧洲社会模型的主要组成部分被认为是社会成果向高层汇合。但是,最新的经济和社会趋势不再以发达国家与发展中国家之间差距的不断缩小为特征。尽管所有欧洲国家都受到了2008年经济危机的影响,并且在2009年采取了协调一致的应对措施,但自2010年以来,我们看到欧洲两组国家之间的分歧越来越大。第一组主要集中在欧洲北部,集中在德国,奥地利,北欧国家以及与德国有密切经济联系的某些东欧国家,已从危机中稳步崛起,并恢复了积极的经济和社会道路。然而,第二组主要由南部和东部外围地区组成,在危机后仍陷于不利的经济和社会局势。本章说明了最初的经济趋同,然后在2008年危机后某些经济和社会成果上出现了明显的分歧。它回顾了对这些分歧的各种解释。最后,它考虑了这种经济和社会二元化的政治结果。我们认为,尽管整个欧洲民粹主义的反欧盟挑战者似乎统一起来,但这些挑战者在提出的申诉方面存在很大差异。激进的右翼政党在中央占主导地位,而激进的左翼政党胜于外围的激进右翼政党,这种动态构成了欧洲的第二种政治双重化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号