首页> 外文OA文献 >Section 5(4) of the Mental Health Act 1983: a review of local policy and guidance in England and Wales
【2h】

Section 5(4) of the Mental Health Act 1983: a review of local policy and guidance in England and Wales

机译:1983年《精神健康法》第5(4)条:对英格兰和威尔士地方政策和指南的审查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to review policy or guidance on the implementation of Section 5(4) written by NHS mental health trusts in England and health boards in Wales.ududDesign/methodology/approach - A Freedom of Information request was submitted to all trusts in England (n = 57) and health boards in Wales (n = 7) asking them to provide a copy of any policy or guidance on the implementation of Section 5(4). Documents were analysed using content analysis. Specific attention was given to any deviations from the national Mental Health Act Codes of Practice.ududFindings - Forty-one (67.2%) organisations had a policy on the implementation of Section 5(4). There was a high level of consistency between local guidance and the Mental Health Act Codes of Practice. There were however; different interpretations of the guidance and errors that could lead to misuse of the section. Some policies contained useful guidance that could be adopted by future versions of the national Codes of Practice.ududResearch implications - The research has demonstrated the value of examining the relationship between national and local guidance. Further research should be undertaken on the frequency and reasons for any reuse of the section.ududPractical implications - Greater attention should be given to considering the necessity of local policy, given the existence of national Codes of Practice. ududOriginality - This is the only research examining the policy framework for the implementation of Section 5(4).udududKeywords: Best practice, in-patient, Mental Health Act, Nurses’ holding power, Policy, Section 5(4).ududPaper type: Research
机译:目的–这项研究的目的是审查由NHS精神卫生信托基金在英格兰和威尔士的卫生局编写的关于实施第5(4)节的政策或指南。 ud ud设计/方法/方法-信息自由的要求已提交给英格兰的所有信托(n = 57)和威尔士的卫生委员会(n = 7),要求他们提供有关执行第5(4)节的任何政策或指南的副本。使用内容分析来分析文档。 ud udFindings-41个组织(67.2%)制定了实施第5(4)节的政策。当地指南与《精神卫生法操作规范》之间存在高度的一致性。但是有对指南和错误的不同解释可能会导致本节的误用。一些政策包含有用的指导,可在以后的国家实践规范中采用。 ud ud研究的意义-研究表明了研究国家与地方指导之间关系的价值。 ud ud实际意义-鉴于存在国家实践准则,应更加重视考虑地方政策的必要性。 ud ud原创性-这是唯一研究第5(4)条实施政策框架的研究。 ud ud ud关键字:最佳实践,住院,《精神卫生法》,护士的掌控权,政策,条款5(4)。 ud ud论文类型:研究

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号