首页> 外文OA文献 >Different approaches to grounding resistance. Calculation for thin wire structures at low frequency energization
【2h】

Different approaches to grounding resistance. Calculation for thin wire structures at low frequency energization

机译:接地电阻的不同方法。低频激励下细线结构的计算

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The present paper deals with the calculation of grounding resistance of an electrode composed of thin wires, that we consider here as perfect electric conductors (PEC) e.g. with null internal resistance, when buried in a soil of uniform resistivity. The potential profile at the ground surface is also calculated when the electrode is energized with low frequency current. The classic treatment by using leakage currents, called Charge Simulated Method (CSM), is compared with that using a set of steady currents along the axis of the wires, here called the Longitudinal Currents Method (LCM), to solve the Maxwell equations. The method of moments is applied to obtain a numerical approximation of the solution by using rectangular basis functions. Both methods are applied to two types of electrodes and the results are also compared with those obtained using a thirth approach, the Average Potential Method (APM), later described in the text. From the analysis performed, we can estimate a value of the error in the determination of grounding resistance as a function of the number of segments in which the electrodes are divided.
机译:本文涉及由细线组成的电极的接地电阻的计算,我们在这里将其视为理想的电导体(PEC),例如当埋在均匀电阻率的土壤中时,内部电阻为零。当用低频电流为电极通电时,还可以计算出地面的电位分布。比较了使用泄漏电流的经典处理方法(称为电荷模拟方法(CSM))和使用沿导线轴的一组稳定电流(此处称为纵向电流方法(LCM))来解决麦克斯韦方程组的经典方法。应用矩量法通过使用矩形基函数获得解的数值近似。两种方法都适用于两种类型的电极,并且还将结果与使用第三种方法(平均电位法(APM))获得的结果进行比较,稍后将在本文中进行描述。从执行的分析中,我们可以确定接地电阻确定中的误差值,该误差值是电极划分的分段数的函数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号