首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluating the equity effects of road-pricing in the European urban context - The Madrid Metropolitan Area
【2h】

Evaluating the equity effects of road-pricing in the European urban context - The Madrid Metropolitan Area

机译:在欧洲城市环境中评估道路定价的公平效应-马德里大都会区

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The paper identifies the potential spatial and social impacts of a proposed road-pricing scheme for different social groups in the Madrid Metropolitan Area (MMA). We appraise the accessibility of different districts within the MMA in terms of the actual and perceived cost of using the road infrastructure ‘before’ and ‘after’ implementation of the scheme. The appraisal framework was developed using quantitative survey data and qualitative focus group discussions with residents. We then simulated user behaviours (mode and route choice) based on the empirical evidence from a travel demand model for the MMA. The results from our simulation model demonstrated that implementation of the toll on the orbital metropolitan motorways (M40, M30, for example) decreases accessibility mostly in the districts where there are no viable public transport alternatives.ududOur specific study finding is that the economic burden of the road-pricing scheme particularly affects unskilled and lower income individuals living in the south of the MMA. The focus groups confirmed that low income drivers in the south part of the MMA would reduce their use of tolled roads and have to find new arrangements for these trips: i.e. switch to public transport, spend double the time travelling or stay at home. More generally, our research finds that European transport planners are still a long way from recognising the social equity implications of their policy decisions and that more thorough social appraisals are needed to avoid the social exclusion of low income populations when road tolling is proposed.
机译:本文确定了马德里大都会区(MMA)不同社会群体拟议道路定价方案的潜在空间和社会影响。我们根据在实施该计划之前和之后使用道路基础设施的实际和可预期的成本,评估MMA内部不同地区的可及性。该评估框架是使用定量调查数据和定性焦点小组与居民进行讨论而开发的。然后,基于来自MMA的旅行需求模型的经验证据,我们模拟了用户行为(模式和路线选择)。我们的仿真模型的结果表明,在轨道大城市高速公路(例如M40,M30)上实施收费,主要是在没有可行的公共交通替代方案的地区减少通行能力。 ud ud我们的具体研究发现是公路计价方案的经济负担特别影响到生活在MMA南部的低技能和低收入人群。焦点小组确认,MMA南部地区的低收入司机将减少收费公路的使用,并必须为这些旅行找到新的安排:即改用公共交通工具,花两倍的时间旅行或留在家中。更广泛地说,我们的研究发现,欧洲交通运输规划者距离认识到其政策决定对社会公平的影响还有很长的路要走,而且在提议收费公路时,需要更彻底的社会评估来避免低收入人群的社会排斥。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号