首页> 外文OA文献 >Symbolic vs substantive sustainability reporting: examining the role of company-level characteristics
【2h】

Symbolic vs substantive sustainability reporting: examining the role of company-level characteristics

机译:象征性与实质性可持续发展报告:研究公司层面特征的作用

摘要

As sustainability reporting (SR) practices have being increasingly adopted by corporations over the last twenty years, most of the existing literature on SR has stressed the role of external determinants (such as institutional and stakeholder pressures) in explaining this uptake. However, given that recent evidence points to a broader range of motives and uses (both external and internal) of SR, we contend that its role within company-level activities deserves greater academic attention. udIn order to address this research gap, this paper seeks to provide a more integrated perspective of both institutional and efficiency explanations of SR dynamics, as well as to highlight the role of company-level characteristics in explaining its contribution to sustainability management practices. More specifically, we suggest that substantive SR implementation can be predicted by assessing the level of fit between the organization and the SR framework being adopted. Building on this idea, our theoretical model defines three forms of fit (technical, cultural and political) and identifies organizational characteristics associated to each of these fits. Finally, implications for academic research, businesses and policy-makers are derived.
机译:在过去的20年中,随着公司越来越多地采用可持续发展报告(SR)的做法,现有的大多数关于SR的文献都强调了外部决定因素(例如机构和利益相关者的压力)在解释这种采用过程中的作用。但是,鉴于最近的证据表明了SR的广泛动机和用途(内部和外部),我们认为SR在公司级活动中的作用值得更多的学术关注。 ud为了解决这一研究空白,本文旨在提供对SR动态的制度和效率解释的更综合的观点,并强调公司级特征在解释其对可持续性管理实践的贡献中的作用。更具体地说,我们建议可以通过评估组织与所采用的SR框架之间的契合度来预测实质性的SR实施。在此思想的基础上,我们的理论模型定义了三种拟合形式(技术,文化和政治),并确定了与这些拟合相关的组织特征。最后,得出对学术研究,企业和政策制定者的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号