首页> 外文OA文献 >Do Teacher Pay for Performance Schemes Advance American Education? What Education and Business Can Learn from Each Other in the Education Reform Movement
【2h】

Do Teacher Pay for Performance Schemes Advance American Education? What Education and Business Can Learn from Each Other in the Education Reform Movement

机译:教师为绩效计划付费是否能促进美国教育?在教育改革运动中,教育与商业可以互相学习的东西

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

States are quickly moving away from the uniform salary schedule used to compensate teachers and are instead implementing various forms of Pay for Performance. While Pay for Performance compensation schemes have proved effective in some areas of business, they are not uniformly applicable and are ill-suited to education reform. By outlining recent developments in this area of the law and by reviewing the justifications for Pay for Performance schemes, this Note shows what education can learn from business and what business can learn from education. Ultimately, it is in the self-interest of businesses to oppose the implementation of Pay for Performance schemes when used to compensate teachers.
机译:各州正在迅速摆脱用于补偿教师的统一薪资表,而是实施各种形式的绩效工资。虽然绩效工资补偿计划在某些业务领域已被证明是有效的,但它们并不是统一适用的,不适用于教育改革。通过概述法律在该领域的最新发展,并回顾绩效薪酬计划的合理性,本注释说明了教育可以从商业中学到什么,商业可以从教育中学到什么。最终,反对使用绩效薪酬计划来补偿教师,这符合企业的自身利益。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bates Devin R.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号