首页> 外文OA文献 >A SYSTEMIC ANALYSIS OF HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS’ ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING :A Case Study in Bandar Lampung
【2h】

A SYSTEMIC ANALYSIS OF HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS’ ARGUMENTATIVE WRITING :A Case Study in Bandar Lampung

机译:高中教师议论文写作的系统分析-以班达楠榜为例。

摘要

This thesis is to report on teachers’ ability in composing expository texts. The texts were composed by six high school teachers in Bandar Lampung, Lampung, Indonesia. This study is a descriptive qualitative case study investigating three Analytical and three Hortatory Expository texts. Those texts were analyzed using Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) to deal with the textual, experiential and interpersonal metafunctions which were exposed within the texts’ Theme, Transitivity and Mood systems. The results of texts analyses then were confirmed and validated through interviews conducted with the teachers.ududThe result of this study shows that the teachers could demonstrate appropriate strategies to compose the texts although some problems of writing were evident in the texts. The grammatical analyses indicate that the writers had successfully attempted to use some of the main conventions of written argumentative discourse. In this case, to construe textual metafunction, the teachers could employ the demands of the generic form of arguing genre, the linguistic devices as well as the thematic progression. Furthermore, referring to experiential metafunction, the teachers could demonstrate their ability to use various linguistic resources such as appropriate conjunction system and appropriate Process types, Circumstantials and Nominalisations. Finally, interpersonally, the writers could enrich the text with the use of appropriate Modality to create objective arguments and communicate with the readers.ududHowever, the study reveals that not all of the teachers’ texts can be considered successful or mature texts in that they seem to have problems with Argument development characterized with lack of fact and objective evidence, inconsistency of argument, and absence of intertextuality. Besides, the inappropriate use of imperative mood, realis/universal statements and some syntax errors are also found. It is found that the teachers’ problems were mainly to do with their time management to carry out the task which resulted in their inability to give maximum efforts to work with the texts. In addition their background knowledge and language competence as well as their commitment to carry out the task also appeared to be problems in producing the texts. Thus, the teachers are suggested to commit to more practices and to have effective teacher trainings to maintain and improve the teachers’ professional competence particularly to concern the issue of SFL and GBA within the curriculum.
机译:本文旨在报告教师撰写说明文的能力。这些文字是由印度尼西亚楠榜班达楠榜的六名中学老师撰写的。这项研究是描述性的定性案例研究,研究了三种分析性和三种园艺说明性文字。这些文本使用系统功能语言学(SFL)进行了分析,以处理文本的主题,及物性和情绪系统中暴露的文本,体验和人际功能。然后,通过与老师的访谈,对课文分析的结果进行了确认和验证。语法分析表明,作者已成功尝试使用书面议论性话语的一些主要约定。在这种情况下,为了理解文本的元功能,教师可以利用对争论类型,语言手段以及主题发展的一般形式的要求。此外,通过体验元功能,教师可以展示他们使用各种语言资源的能力,例如适当的连词系统和适当的过程类型,环境和名词化。最后,在人际交往中,作者可以使用适当的情态来充实文本,以创造客观的论据并与读者交流。 ud ud但是,研究表明,并不是所有的教师文本都可以被认为是成功的或成熟的文本。他们似乎在论证发展方面存在问题,其特征在于缺乏事实和客观证据,论证不一致以及缺乏互文性。此外,还发现命令性语气的不适当使用,真实/通用语句以及一些语法错误。结果发现,教师的问题主要与他们的时间管理有关,无法完成任务,从而导致他们无法尽最大的努力来处理课本。此外,他们的背景知识和语言能力以及对完成这项任务的承诺似乎也是编写文本时遇到的问题。因此,建议教师采取更多的做法,并进行有效的教师培训,以保持和提高教师的专业能力,尤其是在课程中关注SFL和GBA的问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Akmal Refdi;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:26:16

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号