首页> 外文OA文献 >Applying job hazard analysis and William Fine methods on risks identification and assessment of jobs in hot rolling steel, Iran
【2h】

Applying job hazard analysis and William Fine methods on risks identification and assessment of jobs in hot rolling steel, Iran

机译:将工作危害分析和William Fine方法应用于伊朗热轧钢工作的风险识别和评估

摘要

Background and purpose: Comprehensive evaluation of jobs in industries is a practical and effective method that could identify the jobs and industries with negative effects on the environment. This study identified environmental hazards of hot rolling process and assessing their risks. Materials and methods: An observational study was carried out in which identification of human activity and job’s risks in production hall of Kavir Steel Complex was done according to ISO 14001 approaches (pollutant emissions to air, discharges to water, energy consumption, energy released as heat, wastes, side products, etc) by Job Hazard Analysis method (JHA). Then the risks identified were prioritized and assessed using William Fine method. Results: We identified 205 environmental hazards (in 9 groups) associated with production personnel (n= 81), mechanics and maintenance personnel (n= 44), bed personnel (n= 9), personnel of cleaning services (n= 33), and water plant personnel (n= 38). The highest and lowest rate of risks were due to creation and distribution of wastes (n= 73) and corrosion and depreciation of equipment, (n= 1), respectively. Conclusion: The production personnel were mainly responsible for environmental emissions. The leading causes were stress and anxiety about stoppage of production, payment reduction, and lack of awareness and workers and supervisors on environmental issues. © 2017, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. All rights reserved.
机译:背景与目的:对行业职位进行综合评估是一种实用有效的方法,可以识别对环境有负面影响的职位和行业。这项研究确定了热轧过程的环境危害并评估了其风险。材料和方法:进行了一项观察性研究,其中按照ISO 14001的方法(在空气中的污染物排放,水的排放,能源消耗,热量释放的能源)确定了卡维尔钢铁联合公司生产车间中的人类活动和工作风险,废物,副产品等)通过作业危害分析方法(JHA)。然后使用William Fine方法对确定的风险进行优先级排序和评估。结果:我们确定了与生产人员(n = 81),机械和维修人员(n = 44),床铺人员(n = 9),清洁服务人员(n = 33)相关的205种环境危害(共9组),和水厂人员(n = 38)。最高和最低的风险发生率分别是废物的产生和分布(n = 73)以及设备的腐蚀和折旧(n = 1)。结论:生产人员主要负责环境排放。主要原因是生产停顿,付款减少以及对环境问题缺乏认识以及工人和监督员的压力和焦虑。 ©2017,Mazandaran医科大学。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号