首页> 外文OA文献 >Validation of computational fluid-structure interaction models by comparison with collapsible tube experiments.
【2h】

Validation of computational fluid-structure interaction models by comparison with collapsible tube experiments.

机译:通过与可折叠管实验进行比较来验证计算的流体-结构相互作用模型。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The objective of this thesis was to assess the validity of the fluid-structure interactionud(FSI) facilities in LS-DYNA for the analysis of highly deformable structuresudinteracting with flowing viscous fluids. The collapsible tube experiment was chosenudas a validation tool for FSI since its three-dimensional computational modellingudwould have been impossible if the viscous internal fluid flow were not considered.udAn explicit three-dimensional finite element model of a collapsible-tube wasudconstructed and solved using LS-DYNA. The fully coupled model included internaludfluid flow; external, inlet and outlet pressures; tube wall tension; pre-stressing; andudcontact. The finite element boundary conditions were taken as the recorded values ofudflow rate and pressure from a standard collapsible-tube experiment for both steadyudand unsteady flows.udThe predicted tube geometry in the steady LS-DYNA model showed good agreementudwith the experiment for operating points in the highly compliant region of theudpressure-flow characteristic curve. The comparative position of the pinch at theudoutlet end differed by only 5.6% of the outlet diameter in the worst case.udThis analysis represents an advance on other published work in that previously noudcomparison with experiments have been drawn for FSI models involving highudReynolds number flowing viscous fluids interacting with highly deformable three dimensionaludstructures. This analysis successfully made that comparison and theudexperimental and computational results have combined to form a more detailedudpicture of the collapsible-tube phenomenon by including detailed stress results of theudtube walls and views of the internal fluid flow.udThe collapsible tube model exhibited uncertainty errors due to the use of a coarserudthan desirable mesh and a reduced fluid speed of sound. Although both theseudapproximations caused significant error in the model both were necessary in order toudachieve acceptable solution times. Because of these errors a thorough quantitativeudvalidation could not be achieved although LS-DYNA has been proven to beudqualitatively accurate. Increases in computing speed are required before thoroughudquantitative validation of FSI can be achieved by comparison with the collapsible tubeudexperiments.
机译:本文的目的是评估LS-DYNA中流体-结构相互作用 ud(FSI)设施在分析高变形结构与流动性粘性流体相互作用时的有效性。选择了可折叠管实验作为FSI的验证工具,因为如果不考虑粘性内部流体流动,则无法进行FSI的三维计算建模。 ud使用了可折叠管的显式三维有限元模型 ud使用LS-DYNA构造和求解。完全耦合模型包括内部流体流动。外部,入口和出口压力;管壁张力预应力和 udcontact。以有限元边界条件为标准可折叠管实验对稳态 ud和非稳态流量的 udflow速率和压力的记录值。 ud稳态LS-DYNA模型中预测的管几何显示出与 s一致。实验在超压-流量特性曲线的高度适应区域中进行操作。在最坏的情况下, udout末端的收缩位置的相对位置仅变化了出口直径的5.6%。 ud此分析代表了其他已发表工作的进展,因为以前对与FSI模型有关的FSI模型没有进行过实验比较高 ud雷诺数流动的粘性流体与高度变形的三维 ud结构相互作用。该分析成功地通过比较,实验和计算结果,结合了 udtube壁的详细应力结果和内部流体流动的视图,从而形成了“可折叠管”现象的更详细 ud图片。由于使用的网格比所需的网格粗/多,并且流体的声音速度降低,因此模型显示出不确定性误差。尽管这两个 udapproximations都在模型中造成了很大的误差,但两者都 u u200b u200b为了达到可接受的求解时间是必需的。由于这些错误,尽管LS-DYNA已被证明是定性准确的,但仍无法实现彻底的定量未确证。通过与可折叠试管/实验比较,可以实现对FSI的全面定量验证,需要提高计算速度。

著录项

  • 作者

    Scroggs Richard A.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2002
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号