首页> 外文OA文献 >How frequent are prescribing errors and near misses among traditional and non-traditional prescribers and how are they experienced?
【2h】

How frequent are prescribing errors and near misses among traditional and non-traditional prescribers and how are they experienced?

机译:在传统和非传统处方者中,处方错误和接近遗漏的频率有多高?他们的经历如何?

摘要

BackgroundudNurses, midwives, health visitors, pharmacists, chiropodists and othersudhave all begun to assume the role of prescriber of medicines. However,udlittle work has been done comparing how effective these prescribers are inudrelation to the medical or traditional prescribers; and even less looking at theudoverall safety of prescribing in relation to errors and near misses. Thisudstudy examines the safety element to prescribing and encompasses trainingudto prescribe, prescribing in practice, support required, errors and nearudmisses and the experience of both traditional and non-traditionaludpractitioners.udMethodsudEmbedded single case study analysis was used which included threeudsubunits; analysis of one year of reported errors and near misses, semistructuredudinterviews with each group of prescribers and a review of archivaludrecords of prescribing. Prescriptions were analysed using a validated errorudtool and interviews were analysed using Colazzi's procedural steps (1978);udall data were then reviewed using the Brunswikian lens model (Scholz &udTietje 2002).udResultsudAll prescribers wanted better initial prescribing education and continualudupdates once qualified.udNon-traditional prescribers made fewer errors than traditional prescribers,udthough they do have a higher near miss rate than traditional prescribers.ud3 udPrescribers use a range of staff for support, though non-traditionaludprescribers are more likely to use their peer group.udTraditional prescribers have a more relaxed attitude to mistakes.udPrescribing staff do not trust the incident reporting system primarily sinceudthere is no useful feedback given which would improve prescribingudpractices.udConclusionsudThe trust needs to work with educational institutions to improve prescribingudtraining for all staff. They also need to ensure that there is some methodudavailable for all prescribers to be regularly updated or tested on their abilityudto prescribe.udErrors or near miss incidents involving prescribing must be shared with alludprescribers so that everyone can learn from them.udThis information is transferable to other, similar institutions.
机译:背景护士,助产士,医疗访问者,药剂师,手足病医生和其他人都已经开始承担开药者的角色。但是,已经进行了一些艰巨的工作来比较这些处方者与医学或传统处方者之间的有效性。甚至更少地考虑与错误和差错有关的处方的总体安全性。本研究调查了开处方的安全性,包括培训,处方开处方,实践中的处方,所需的支持,错误和差错,以及传统和非传统医师的经验。 udMethods ud嵌入式单例研究分析是使用了包括三个 udsubunits;一年报告错误和差错的分析,每组开处方者的半结构式 udinterviews和处方 udrecord的回顾。使用经过验证的错误 udtool对处方进行分析,并使用Colazzi的程序步骤(1978)对访谈进行分析; udall数据然后使用Brunswikian镜片模型进行审查(Scholz& udTietje 2002)。 udResults ud所有处方者都希望更好地进行初始处方教育 ud非传统处方者比传统处方者犯的错误少, ud尽管传统处方者比传统处方者犯错误的几率更高。 ud3 ud尽管非传统处方者的非传统处方者使用了很多人员来提供支持, ud传统处方者对错误的态度更宽松。 ud处方人员不信任事件报告系统,主要是因为没有有用的反馈可以改善处方 udpractics。 udConclusions ud信托需要与教育机构合作,以改善对所有员工的处方/培训。他们还需要确保有某种方法可以对所有处方者进行定期更新或对其能力进行测试 udd处方。 ud必须与所有人共享涉及udm的错误或差错事件,以便每个人都可以从他们身上学习。 ud此信息可转移到其他类似的机构。

著录项

  • 作者

    Paterson Lynne;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号