首页> 外文OA文献 >ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIC AND CONVENTIONAL OLIVE GROVES IN THE MESSARA VALLEY, CRETE, GREECE.ud
【2h】

ENERGY EFFICIENCY AND LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIC AND CONVENTIONAL OLIVE GROVES IN THE MESSARA VALLEY, CRETE, GREECE.ud

机译:希腊克里特岛梅萨拉河谷有机和常规橄榄沟的能效和寿命周期分析。 ud

摘要

Environmental Impacts of agricultural activities have to be assessed in order to address cultural practices and the type of farming that are best suited to avoid the trade-off between the Ecology and the Economy.ududFurthermore, this study, comparing the environmental impacts with the Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of Organic and Conventional olive oil production, is proposing to consider the relationship between the Energy Efficiency and the environmental impacts, notably the Climate Change (Global Warming contribution through Greenhouse Gas emission).udThe LCA is used to take into account the impacts of the production system from the Cradle (input production) to the Farm gate (final farm product) and considers 7 environmental impacts potential categories: Global Warming, Acidification, Eutrophication, Biodiversity, Erosion, Resource depletion, Ground water depletion. The study also assesses the Energy efficiency of both systems.ududThe results show a clear difference between organic and conventional production, namely a two-fold improvement of the energy efficiency in the organic production. Even if the differences are reduced when the results are calculated on the yield rather than the area, the organic methods have a far smaller contribution to Global warming, Eutrophication, Biodiversity loss, Soil loss, Groundwater depletion and Energy use whereas, the Acidification potential is comparable in both cases.ududThe study recommends encouraging some of the cultural practices that are used in the organic farming methods in order to reduce the burden of agriculture on the local and global ecology as well as the natural resources. udud
机译:必须评估农业活动对环境的影响,以解决最适合避免生态与经济之间权衡的文化习俗和农业类型。 ud ud此外,本研究还将环境影响与有机和常规橄榄油生产的生命周期分析(LCA)建议考虑能源效率与环境影响之间的关系,特别是气候变化(温室气体排放对全球变暖的贡献)。 udLCA用于考虑了生产系统从摇篮(投入生产)到农场大门(最终农产品)的影响,并考虑了7种潜在的环境影响类别:全球变暖,酸化,富营养化,生物多样性,侵蚀,资源枯竭,地下水枯竭。该研究还评估了两个系统的能源效率。 ud ud结果表明,有机生产与常规生产之间存在明显差异,即有机生产中的能源效率提高了两倍。即使以产量而不是面积来计算结果,即使减少了差异,有机方法对全球变暖,富营养化,生物多样性丧失,土壤流失,地下水枯竭和能源利用的贡献也要小得多,而酸化潜力却是在这两种情况下都具有可比性。 ud ud研究建议鼓励有机耕作方法中使用的某些文化习惯,以减轻农业对当地和全球生态以及自然资源的负担。 ud ud

著录项

  • 作者

    Dessane Mr Damien;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2003
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号