首页> 外文OA文献 >From environmental concerns towards sustainable food provisioning. Material flow and food consumption scenario studies on sustainability of agri-food systems
【2h】

From environmental concerns towards sustainable food provisioning. Material flow and food consumption scenario studies on sustainability of agri-food systems

机译:从环境问题到可持续食品供应。关于农业食品系统可持续性的物质流和粮食消费情景研究

摘要

Agriculture is an economic activity that heavily relies on the availability of natural resources. Through its role in food production agriculture is a major factor affecting public welfare and health, and its indirect contribution to gross domestic product and employment is significant. Agriculture also contributes to numerous ecosystem services through management of rural areas. However, the environmental impact of agriculture is considerable and reaches far beyond the agro­ecosystems. The questions related to farming for food production are, thus, manifold and of great public concern. Improving environmental performance of agriculture and sustainability of food production, "sustainabilizing" food production, calls for application of wide range of expertise knowledge. This study falls within the field of agro-ecology, with interphases to food systems and sustainability research and exploits the methods typical of industrial ecology. The research in these fields extends from multidisciplinary to interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary, a holistic approach being the key tenet. The methods of industrial ecology have been applied extensively to explore the interaction between human economic activity and resource use. Specifically, the material flow approach (MFA) has established its position through application of systematic environmental and economic accounting statistics. However, very few studies have applied MFA specifically to agriculture. The MFA approach was used in this thesis in such a context in Finland. The focus of this study is the ecological sustainability of primary production. The aim was to explore the possibilities of assessing ecological sustainability of agriculture by using two different approaches. In the first approach the MFA-methods from industrial ecology were applied to agriculture, whereas the other is based on the food consumption scenarios. The two approaches were used in order to capture some of the impacts of dietary changes and of changes in production mode on the environment. The methods were applied at levels ranging from national to sector and local levels. Through the supply-demand approach, the viewpoint changed between that of food production to that of food consumption. The main data sources were official statistics complemented with published research results and expertise appraisals. MFA approach was used to define the system boundaries, to quantify the material flows and to construct eco-efficiency indicators for agriculture. The results were further elaborated for an input-output model that was used to analyse the food flux in Finland and to determine its relationship to the economy-wide physical and monetary flows. The methods based on food consumption scenarios were applied at regional and local level for assessing feasibility and environmental impacts of re-localising food production. The approach was also used for quantification and source allocation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of primary production. GHG assessment provided, thus, a means of cross-checking the results obtained by using the two different approaches. MFA data as such or expressed as eco-efficiency indicators, are useful in describing the overall development. However, the data are not sufficiently detailed for identifying the hot spots of environmental sustainability. Eco-efficiency indicators should not be bluntly used in environmental assessment: the carrying capacity of the nature, the potential exhaustion of non-renewable natural resources and the possible rebound effect need also to be accounted for when striving towards improved eco-efficiency. The input-output model is suitable for nationwide economy analyses and it shows the distribution of monetary and material flows among the various sectors. Environmental impact can be captured only at a very general level in terms of total material requirement, gaseous emissions, energy consumption and agricultural land use. Improving environmental performance of food production requires more detailed and more local information. The approach based on food consumption scenarios can be applied at regional or local scales. Based on various diet options the method accounts for the feasibility of re-localising food production and environmental impacts of such re-localisation in terms of nutrient balances, gaseous emissions, agricultural energy consumption, agricultural land use and diversity of crop cultivation. The approach is applicable anywhere, but the calculation parameters need to be adjusted so as to comply with the specific circumstances. The food consumption scenario approach, thus, pays attention to the variability of production circumstances, and may provide some environmental information that is locally relevant. The approaches based on the input-output model and on food consumption scenarios represent small steps towards more holistic systemic thinking. However, neither one alone nor the two together provide sufficient information for "sustainabilizing" food production. Environmental performance of food production should be assessed together with the other criteria of sustainable food provisioning. This requires evaluation and integration of research results from many different disciplines in the context of a specified geographic area. Foodshed area that comprises both the rural hinterlands of food production and the population centres of food consumption is suggested to represent a suitable areal extent for such research. Finding a balance between the various aspects of sustainability is a matter of optimal trade-off. The balance cannot be universally determined, but the assessment methods and the actual measures depend on what the bottlenecks of sustainability are in the area concerned. These have to be agreed upon among the actors of the area.udud
机译:农业是一种严重依赖自然资源的经济活动。通过其在粮食生产中的作用,农业是影响公共福利和健康的主要因素,它对国内生产总值和就业的间接贡献是巨大的。农业还通过农村地区的管理为众多生态系统服务做出了贡献。但是,农业对环境的影响是巨大的,其影响远远超出农业生态系统。因此,与用于粮食生产的农业有关的问题是多方面的,引起了公众极大的关注。改善农业的环境绩效和粮食生产的可持续性,“可持续”粮食生产,要求应用广泛的专门知识。该研究属于农业生态学领域,与食品系统和可持续性研究处于中间阶段,并采用了工业生态学的典型方法。这些领域的研究从多学科延伸到跨学科和跨学科,整体方法是主要宗旨。工业生态方法已被广泛地用于探索人类经济活动与资源利用之间的相互作用。具体而言,物料流方法(MFA)通过应用系统的环境和经济核算统计数据确立了自己的地位。但是,很少有研究专门将MFA应用于农业。在这种情况下,芬兰采用了MFA方法。这项研究的重点是初级生产的生态可持续性。目的是探索使用两种不同方法评估农业生态可持续性的可能性。在第一种方法中,将来自工业生态学的MFA方法应用于农业,而另一种方法则基于粮食消费情景。使用这两种方法是为了捕获饮食变化和生产方式变化对环境的某些影响。这些方法在从国家到部门和地方各级的水平上得到了应用。通过供求关系,观点从粮食生产到粮食消费都在变化。主要数据来源是官方统计数据,并有已发表的研究结果和专业知识鉴定。 MFA方法用于定义系统边界,量化物料流并构建农业的生态效率指标。进一步详细说明了输入-输出模型的结果,该模型用于分析芬兰的食物流通量,并确定其与经济范围内的物质和货币流动的关系。在区域和地方一级采用了基于粮食消费情景的方法,以评估重新定位粮食生产的可行性和环境影响。该方法还用于量化和一次生产的温室气体(GHG)排放源分配。因此,GHG评估提供了一种交叉检查使用两种不同方法获得的结果的方法。 MFA数据本身或表示为生态效率指标的数据,对于描述总体发展非常有用。但是,数据不够详细,无法确定环境可持续性的热点。在环境评估中,不应过分使用生态效率指标:在努力提高生态效率时,还应考虑自然的承载能力,不可再生自然资源的潜在枯竭以及可能的反弹效应。投入产出模型适用于全国经济分析,它显示了货币和物质流动在各个部门之间的分布。就总的材料需求,气体排放,能源消耗和农业用地而言,只能在非常一般的水平上捕获环境影响。改善食品生产的环境绩效需要更详细和更多的本地信息。基于粮食消费情景的方法可以在区域或地方范围内应用。根据各种饮食选择,该方法从营养平衡,气体排放,农业能源消耗,农业土地利用和农作物种植多样性的角度考虑了重新定位粮食生产的可行性以及这种重新定位的环境影响。该方法适用于任何地方,但是需要调整计算参数以符合特定情况。因此,食品消费情景方法关注生产情况的变化,并可能提供一些与当地相关的环境信息。基于投入产出模型和粮食消费情景的方法代表了朝着更全面的系统思维迈出的小步。然而,无论是一个人还是两个人都没有提供足够的信息来“维持”粮食生产。食品生产的环境绩效应与可持续食品供应的其他标准一起进行评估。这要求在指定地理区域内评估和整合来自许多不同学科的研究结果。建议同时包括粮食生产的农村腹地和粮食消费的人口中心的食区代表这种研究的适当范围。在可持续性的各个方面之间寻求平衡是最佳权衡的问题。不能普遍确定平衡,但是评估方法和实际措施取决于相关领域中可持续性的瓶颈。这些必须在区域参与者之间达成共识。 ud ud

著录项

  • 作者

    Risku-Norja Helmi;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-31 14:56:53

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号