The paper describes the results of a comparison between two accreditation criteria: the IFOAM Accreditation Criteria and ISO 65 (EN 45011. udThe comparison does not provide an assessment of each norm, and the format of the comparison makes it difficult to make a quick overview on the major differences. In addition, a summary and an assessment of the variations of both norms are missing. ududOn the other hand, the comparison enables the reader to make their own assessment and as such will be a valuable tool in the discussion and negotiations about recognition of IFOAM Accreditation.
展开▼
机译:本文介绍了两种认证标准(IFOAM认证标准和ISO 65(EN 45011)的比较结果。 ud比较未提供对每个规范的评估,并且比较的格式使得难以快速进行概述。另外,缺少两个规范的摘要和评估。 ud ud另一方面,比较使读者可以进行自己的评估,因此这将是读者宝贵的工具。关于IFOAM认证认可的讨论和谈判。
展开▼