首页> 外文OA文献 >Does organic livestock husbandry uses less energy and produces less greenhouse gas than conventional husbandry? Analysis in lactating sheep farms
【2h】

Does organic livestock husbandry uses less energy and produces less greenhouse gas than conventional husbandry? Analysis in lactating sheep farms

机译:有机畜牧业比传统畜牧业消耗更少的能源并产生更少的温室气体吗?泌乳绵羊场的分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We have undertaken in this work an evaluation of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and the Non-Renewable Energy (NRE) consumption on a sample of 1250 farms-years, operating in sheep meat production, in either organic (OA) or conventional (CA) agriculture, over the period 1987 to 2012, based on the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) method. There was no significant difference for NRE consumption (79.6 MJ in OA and 79.7 MJ in CA, per kg of carcass); indeed the gains in OA thanks to a lower use of chemical fertilizers and purchase of lesser concentrates feed were offset by the higher level of mechanization (here fuels and equipment). For GHG emissions, we found a significant difference of 5% beneficial to organic production systems (31.1 vs. 32.7 kg CO2 eq/kg carcass).
机译:在这项工作中,我们对1250个农场年的样本进行了温室气体(GHG)排放和不可再生能源(NRE)消耗的评估,这些样本以羊肉生产,有机(OA)或常规(基于生命周期评估(LCA)方法的1987年至2012年间的农业)。 NRE消耗量无显着差异(OA / CA和CA为79.7 MJ / kg per体);的确,由于减少了化学肥料的使用和购买了较少精矿饲料,OA的收益被较高的机械化水平(这里是燃料和设备)所抵消。对于温室气体排放,我们发现对有机生产系统有利的差异为5%(31.1千克二氧化碳当量/32.7千克二氧化碳当量/千克car体)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号