首页> 外文OA文献 >Assessment of Farm Animal Welfare using Organic Animal Husbandry Standards as Yardstick: A micro-level study in India
【2h】

Assessment of Farm Animal Welfare using Organic Animal Husbandry Standards as Yardstick: A micro-level study in India

机译:使用有机畜牧业标准作为标准对农场动物福利进行评估:印度的一项微观研究

摘要

Animal welfare has attracted widespread attention worldwide in recent times including within the conventional systems of intensive production in industrialized countries. It can be assessed in a number of ways, also, the yardstick of welfare may differ from people to people and region to region since OIE is only now considering development of more science-based internationally acceptable criteria for animal welfare. In this study, the organic livestock production standards, developed inter alia, the Government of India (GOI) under its National Programme for Organic Production (NPOP), were used to assess the practices being followed at farmers' level in India. Organic production standards are supposed to keep animal welfare as one of the top most requirements with no compromise on welfare issues. A micro-level study was conducted in Bankura district (22038′N-23038′N and 86036′E-87046′E) in India with 50 tribal and 50 non-tribal farmers practicing mixed crop-livestock farming. The farmers (average landholding 1.02 ha, average herd size 4.02 cattle equivalent), were asked about several animal welfare criteria including those for draft animals. It was found that almost all farmers, either, tribal or non-tribal provide shelter to animals against extreme weather conditions. Ninety percent of the farmers provided immediate treatment to sick animals and none of the farmers used sick animals at work. However, 26.46% of non tribals beat their animals at work. Nine point eighty-five percent of farmers confessed that they sometimes overload their animals. The average duration of work in summer, rainy season and winter was found to be 5.27 h, 7.09 h and 5 h, respectively. In the study, it was found that the welfare standards were well cared of though farmers were not organic per se, nor they have had any specific training or programme on animal welfare measures. It is recommended that the organic animal standards may be used as the yardstick to measure animal welfare even in conventional non-organic forms of livestock production systems as is demonstrated in the current study.
机译:近来,动物福利已引起全世界的广泛关注,包括在工业化国家的传统集约化生产系统中。可以用多种方法进行评估,而且福利标准可能因人而异,因为世界动物卫生组织现在才考虑制定更加科学的,国际上可以接受的动物福利标准。在这项研究中,有机印度畜牧生产标准是由印度政府(GOI)根据其国家有机生产计划(NPOP)制定的,用于评估印度农民所遵循的做法。有机生产标准应该将动物福利作为最重要的要求之一,而不会在福利问题上妥协。在印度的班库拉区(22038'N-23038'N和86036'E-87046'E)进行了微观研究,有50名部落和50名非部落农民从事农作物-畜牧业的混合种植。向农民(平均土地面积1.02公顷,平均牛群大小4.02头牛当量)询问了几项动物福利标准,包括牲畜标准。发现几乎所有的部落或非部落农民都可以在极端天气条件下为动物提供庇护所。 90%的农民为病畜提供了立即治疗,没有一个农民在工作中使用病畜。但是,有26.46%的非部落成员在工作中殴打他们的动物。百分之九十五的农民承认他们有时使牲畜超负荷。夏季,雨季和冬季的平均工作时间分别为5.27小时,7.09小时和5小时。在研究中,人们发现福利标准得到了很好的照顾,尽管农民本身不是有机的,他们也没有接受任何有关动物福利措施的专门培训或计划。建议将有机动物标准用作衡量动物福利的标准,即使在本研究中证明的常规非有机形式的畜牧生产系统中也是如此。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号