首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluating and regulating the impacts of lobbying in the EU? The case study of green industries
【2h】

Evaluating and regulating the impacts of lobbying in the EU? The case study of green industries

机译:评估和规范在欧盟游说的影响?绿色产业案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

How should we evaluate and regulate the impacts of lobbying in the European Union (EU)? The current lack of transparency around lobbying activities and the absence of formal regulation mean that a hidden lobbying problem may prevail. The tentative case study of green industries in the EU is illustrative. The wind turbine industry, for example, benefits from ambitious environmental target levels for greenhouse gas reductions that will increase the future market for renewable energy. In contrast, for example, no environmental target levels exist that increase the future market shares of organic farming. Rational choice theory suggests that lobbying and group size advantages can explain the observed difference in achieving environmental target levels. The EU may learn from the US legislation as a starting point for a best‐practice solution and future evaluation of impacts of lobbying in the EU.
机译:我们应该如何评估和规范游说对欧盟(EU)的影响?目前,游说活动缺乏透明度,缺乏正式的法规,这意味着潜在的游说问题可能会普遍存在。欧盟绿色产业的初步案例研究是说明性的。例如,风力涡轮机行业受益于降低温室气体排放的雄心勃勃的环境目标水平,这将增加未来的可再生能源市场。相反,例如,不存在增加有机农业未来市场份额的环境目标水平。理性选择理论表明,游说和团体规模优势可以解释在实现环境目标水平方面观察到的差异。欧盟可能会从美国立法中学到经验,以此作为最佳做法解决方案和对欧盟游说影响的未来评估的起点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Svendsen Gert Tinggaard;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号