首页> 外文OA文献 >Building trust, addressing uncertainty: developing Aboriginal consultation practices for mineral exploration companies
【2h】

Building trust, addressing uncertainty: developing Aboriginal consultation practices for mineral exploration companies

机译:建立信任,解决不确定性:为矿产勘探公司开发原住民咨询做法

摘要

This thesis examines how mineral exploration companies in the Thunder Bay region are consulting with Aboriginal communities. The research is based on new regulations put forth by the Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) which, as part of a new plans and permits regime, require mining companies to consult with Aboriginal communities prior to any exploration occurring on their traditional lands. Historically, Aboriginal peoples have been left out of resource development decision making, but with increased recognition of Aboriginal and Treaty rights, they have begun demanding prior consultation, and have become influential in natural resource development. For background information and better understanding of the new regulations, interviews were conducted with two representatives fromthe MNDM. Next, in order to examine what effect these new regulations have had on the mining industry, I interviewed representatives of 15 companies from April 2013 to December 2013. To quantify aspects of this research, this study evaluated companies using Cultural Intelligence(CQ) and Dynamic Capabilities (DC) frameworks. My analysis of interview data yielded 21 prominent themes, 7 of which were queried while 14 occurred spontaneously. The most common themes that occurred were ?concerns with government? and ?operational difficulties?. CQ scores ranged from 50% to 89.3% and DC scores ranged from 14.3% to 82.5%. The results show that many companies were already consulting with Aboriginal communities before it became mandatory, but are still facing challenges. The main issues that companies are facing as a result of the regulations are: lengthened project timelines, lack of capacity and resources to properly consult communities, communication with Aboriginal management, unregulated community expenses, uncertainties of role responsibility, and lack of government involvement. I explain the usefulness of the CQ and DC scales in this study and how they are excellent tools for comparing companies that have had successful engagement experiences with those that experience unproductive engagement. I believe that companies are consulting with communities as bestthey can with the resources they have, but consultation must not be just between company and community; the government must play a stronger role in such proceedings.
机译:本文研究了桑德贝地区的矿产勘探公司如何与土著社区进行协商。这项研究基于安大略省北部开发和矿业部(MNDM)提出的新法规,作为新计划和许可制度的一部分,该法规要求矿业公司在对传统土地进行任何勘探之前必须与土著社区进行协商。 。从历史上看,原住民一直被排除在资源开发决策之外,但是随着人们对原住民和条约权利的日益重视,他们开始要求事先咨询,并已对自然资源开发产生影响。为了获得背景信息和更好地理解新法规,对MNDM的两名代表进行了采访。接下来,为了检查这些新法规对采矿业的影响,我采访了2013年4月至2013年12月的15家公司的代表。为了量化研究的各个方面,本研究使用了Cultural Intelligence(CQ)和Dynamic功能(DC)框架。我对访谈数据的分析产生了21个突出的主题,其中有7个被询问,而有14个是自发出现的。发生的最常见主题是“对政府的担忧”。和“运营困难”。 CQ分数从50%到89.3%不等,DC分数从14.3%到82.5%不等。结果表明,在强制执行之前,许多公司已经在与原住民社区进行协商,但仍面临挑战。公司由于法规而面临的主要问题是:延长项目时限,缺乏适当的社区咨询能力和资源,与原住民管理部门的沟通,社区支出不受管制,角色责任的不确定性以及缺乏政府干预。我将解释CQ和DC量表在这项研究中的有用性,以及它们是如何将拥有成功参与经验的公司与经历非生产参与的公司进行比较的出色工具。我相信公司正在尽其所能地与社区进行协商,但是协商不能仅在公司与社区之间进行;政府必须在此类诉讼中发挥更大的作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Keffer Aaron;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号