首页> 外文OA文献 >Philosophy in an Evolving Web: Necessary Conditions, Web Technologies, and the Discovery Project
【2h】

Philosophy in an Evolving Web: Necessary Conditions, Web Technologies, and the Discovery Project

机译:不断发展的网络中的哲学:必要条件,网络技术和发现项目

摘要

The Internet has been a mixed blessing for humanities’ scholars, and especially for philosophers. On the positive side, instant access to an inexhaustible fount of information caters to our inveterate and equally inexhaustible curiosity. And recent developments in both habits of use and technological capacity captured, albeit loosely, in the notion of Web 2.0 have made the Web, in particular, ever more hospitable to philosophy. And yet for the purposes of academic research, the Internet has heretofore suffered from decisive shortcomings. The very freedoms that make cyberspace a lively forum for intellectual exchange make it treacherous for scholarship. The litany of questions is familiar enough: how reliable, for example, are the articles in Wikipedia? Or those in any given electronic journal? Or the translations that can be found on, say, the Pirate Nietzsche Page? Is that website even in existence any longer? And if not, what happens if I cited it as a source in an essay I wrote? Perhaps one may think I had it coming, citing a website with a name like that. But how about the more staid-sounding Conference: A Journal of Philosophy and Theory, hosted by Columbia University? Or Earth Ethics? Or Acta Philosophica: An International Journal of Philosophy hosted by the Pontifical University of the Holy Cross? All were once available on the Web but are presently defunct, and while that last one may yet be resurrected, there is no shortage of examples of online resources that have disappeared forever. And there is the more general and more pervasive problem of broken links.1 In a nutshell, the questions pertain to standards of quality and stability of sources. In this paper, we shall be considering how digital technology and in particular recent innovations in networking and Semantic Web can be exploited to assist scholars in conducting academic research while at the same time avoiding the pitfalls that render the Internet a false friend of scholarship. We begin with an attempt to articulate certain principles that are independent of any given technology but are of fundamental significance for the humanities in general as it becomes ever more intertwined with emerging information technology. In light of these principles, we then turn to a detailed look at one particular example?the Discovery Project, recently launched under the aegis of the European Union’s eContentplus programme?that is presently developing a web-based network for academic research in philosophy. And we conclude by noting three major challenges that confront this project and all similar initiatives aimed at integrating humanities research and digital technology.
机译:互联网对人文学者,尤其是哲学家而言,是好坏参半的福。从积极的一面来看,即时获取无穷无尽的信息源可以满足我们的专业知识和同样无穷无尽的好奇心。 Web 2.0概念的使用习惯和技术能力的最新发展(尽管有些松散)已使Web特别是哲学变得更加热情好客。然而,出于学术研究的目的,迄今为止,互联网遭受了决定性的缺点。自由使网络空间成为活跃的知识交流论坛,这使得奖学金变得无所适从。一连串的问题已经足够熟悉:例如,维基百科中的文章是否可靠?还是任何给定电子期刊中的那些?还是可以在“海盗尼采”页上找到的翻译?该网站是否已经存在?如果没有,如果我在我写的文章中引用它作为来源,会发生什么?也许有人以为我引用了一个这样的名称的网站,也许我认为它来了。但是,由哥伦比亚大学主办的听起来更清醒的会议怎么样:《哲学与理论杂志》呢?还是地球伦理?还是Acta Philosophica:由圣十字教皇大学主持的国际哲学期刊?所有这些曾经都可以在网上找到,但目前已经不存在了,尽管最后一个可能已经复活了,但并不缺少在线资源永久消失的例子。断开链接还有一个更普遍,更普遍的问题。1简而言之,问题与源的质量和稳定性标准有关。在本文中,我们将考虑如何利用数字技术,尤其是网络和语义网中的最新创新来协助学者进行学术研究,同时避免使互联网成为学者的虚假朋友的陷阱。我们首先尝试阐明某些原理,这些原理与任何给定的技术无关,但随着它与新兴信息技术的交织越来越紧密,对人类总体而言具有根本意义。根据这些原则,我们接下来将详细研究一个特定的示例,即在欧盟eContentplus计划的主持下启动的“发现项目”,该项目目前正在开发一个基于网络的哲学学术研究网络。最后,我们指出了该项目面临的三个主要挑战以及旨在整合人文研究与数字技术的所有类似举措。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号