首页> 外文OA文献 >Research and development, voluntary export restriction, tariffs: a comment
【2h】

Research and development, voluntary export restriction, tariffs: a comment

机译:研究与开发,自愿出口限制,关税:评论

摘要

In a recent issue of this journal, Bouët (2001) offers a contribution to the literature dealing with the implication of quantitative restrictions in international oligopolies. The main result of the paper is that When the R-D investment has uncertain consequences on marginal cost, a voluntary export restriction (VER) decreases innovation by the domestic producer as compared to the free trade level. This result holds both under Cournot and Bertrand competition (p.323). The aim of the present note is to show that, contrary to the author's claim, the qualitative impact of the VER on R-D investment does depend on the mode of market competition in his model. In order to show this, we provide a counter-example that makes use of the linear example developed by Bouët (2001) and solve it for Bertrand competition (instead of Cournot). In this case, a VER increases R-D expenses (instead of decreasing it under Cournot), i.e. depending on the mode of competition, the implication of the VER on the R-D investment are reversed.
机译:在最新一期的杂志中,Bouët(2001)对涉及国际寡头定量限制的文献做出了贡献。本文的主要结果是,当R-D投资对边际成本产生不确定的影响时,与自由贸易水平相比,自愿出口限制(VER)减少了国内生产者的创新。这一结果在古诺和贝特朗的比赛中均成立(第323页)。本说明的目的是表明,与作者的主张相反,VER对R-D投资的质量影响确实取决于其模型中的市场竞争模式。为了证明这一点,我们提供了一个反例,该反例利用了Bouët(2001)开发的线性例子,并解决了Bertrand竞争(代替Cournot)的问题。在这种情况下,VER增加了R-D支出(而不是在古诺特时期降低了支出),即,根据竞争模式,VER对R-D投资的影响是相反的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wauthy Xavier;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2001
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号