首页> 外文OA文献 >The competition assessment framework for the retail energy sector: some concerns about the proposed interpretation
【2h】

The competition assessment framework for the retail energy sector: some concerns about the proposed interpretation

机译:零售能源行业的竞争评估框架:对拟议解释的一些担忧

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The framework proposed by Ofgem, OFT and CMA invokes a well-functioning market, but the Competition Commission has not always used such a concept, and when it has done so it has been problematic. Here, the well-functioning market is Ofgem's vision of a successful market, not anchored in any actual market. Ofgem's indicators of a competitive market have changed since 2002: tariff variety and products tailored to different customer groups are now a harmful complexity rather than a potential benefit of competition. The proposed “theories of harm” ignore regulatory policy and coordinated conduct facilitated by regulation. The analysis of weak customer response fails to distinguish between competition as an equilibrium state and as the Competition Commission's rivalrous discovery process over time. The framework thus reflects Ofgem's perspective, but the assessment needs to be independent because regulation is at issue, and because Ofgem is no longer capable of a competition assessment.
机译:Ofgem,OFT和CMA提出的框架调用了一个运作良好的市场,但是竞争委员会并不总是使用这样的概念,一旦这样做,就会出现问题。在这里,运作良好的市场是Ofgem对成功市场的愿景,而不是扎根于任何实际市场。 Ofgem的竞争市场指标自2002年以来发生了变化:针对不同客户群定制的关税品种和产品现在是有害的复杂性,而不是竞争的潜在利益。提出的“损害理论”忽略了监管政策和由监管促进的协调行为。对弱客户响应的分析未能区分竞争是平衡状态还是竞争委员会随着时间的推移而艰难的发现过程。因此,该框架反映了Ofgem的观点,但是评估需要独立,因为法规存在争议,并且因为Ofgem不再能够进行竞争评估。

著录项

  • 作者

    Littlechild S.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号