首页> 外文OA文献 >Professional change and knowledge translation in mental health nursing: case study of the integration of a health policy into practice
【2h】

Professional change and knowledge translation in mental health nursing: case study of the integration of a health policy into practice

机译:心理卫生护理中的专业变革和知识转化:将卫生政策纳入实践的案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This investigation aims to explore the area of change and knowledge translation in professional practice by using a case study to investigate the integration of a health policy into clinical mental health nursing (MHN) practice. It will address the research question of ‘What factors influenced the integration of Choosing Health (2006) and the Well-being Support Programme (WBSP) at the Trust’ by exploring how mental health nurses and managers of mental health services constructed and operationalised the recommendations of this policy into mental health services 2007-2008. A case study design and constructivist grounded theory methodology were used and the participants were taken from two groups who both worked in the Trust: registered mental health nurses (MHN) (n=28) and clinical managers of mental health services (n=18). Data were collected from the reflective accounts of the participants’ experiences of implementing the Choosing Health (2006) policy recommendations over a six month period during 2008. The Trust in this study was a large mental health and social care Trust in the South-East of England. Data were deductively analysed using a modified version of Lewin’s (1946) change theory which found six minor themes representing the factors that affected the implementation of Choosing Health (2006) in the Trust. The factors were common to both practitioners and managers and were: resources; policy and procedures; leadership in change; personal and professional development: support; motivation and innovation. The relationships between the six minor themes were examined further using inductive analysis producing three key themes that answered the research question of this study which are: organisational factors; professional factors and individual factors. This thesis argues that professional, as defined by Dopher (2012), influence in health policy both individually and strategically is weak, indicating deficits in professional influence, specifically in relation to organisational influence and professional representation. Further, shortfalls in professional influence at both local and national level were identified, resulting in under representation of the professional values, beliefs, codes of conduct and culture of mental health nursing (MHN). It is proposed that groups representing MHN should provide a higher profile advising on and developing mental health policy to improve the translation of policy into practice instead of its interpretation into practice. It also recommends that there should be an increased involvement in critically evaluating the professionally relevant evidence pertaining to the policy and an means of interpretation policy implications in terms of the practitioners related roles and responsibilities.
机译:这项调查旨在通过案例研究,探讨将健康政策整合到临床心理健康护理(MHN)实践中的案例,从而探索专业实践中的变化和知识转化的领域。它将探讨精神卫生护士和精神卫生服务管理者如何构建和实施建议,以解决“哪些因素影响了“选择健康”(2006)和信托基金会的福祉支持计划(WBSP)的整合”的研究问题。 2007-2008年将这项政策纳入精神卫生服务。使用了案例研究设计和建构主义扎根的理论方法,参与者来自在信托基金会工作的两个小组:注册精神卫生护士(MHN)(n = 28)和精神卫生服务的临床经理(n = 18) 。数据是从参与者对2008年六个月期间实施“选择健康”(2006)政策建议的经验的反思性描述中收集的。本研究中的信托基金是美国东南部的大型精神卫生和社会关怀信托基金。英国。使用改良版的Lewin(1946)变更理论对数据进行演绎分析,发现了六个次要主题,这些主题代表了影响《信托基金会》中《选择健康》(2006)实施的因素。这些因素对于从业者和管理者都是共同的,它们是:资源;政策和程序;领导变革个人和专业发展:支持;动力和创新。使用归纳分析进一步检查了六个次要主题之间的关系,得出了三个关键主题,这些主题回答了本研究的研究问题:组织因素;专业因素和个人因素。本论文认为,按照Dopher(2012)的定义,专业人士对卫生政策的影响无论在个人还是战略上都是微弱的,这表明专业影响力不足,特别是在组织影响力和专业代表方面。此外,还发现了地方和国家两级专业影响力的不足,导致专业价值观,信念,行为守则和精神卫生护理文化(MHN)的代表性不足。建议代表MHN的团体应提供更高的建议,以建议和制定精神卫生政策,以改善将政策转化为实践而不是将其转化为实践。它还建议应更多地参与批判性地评估与该政策有关的专业相关证据,并根据从业者的相关角色和职责来解释政策含义。

著录项

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号