首页> 外文OA文献 >Obesity and smoking: can we catch two birds with one tax?
【2h】

Obesity and smoking: can we catch two birds with one tax?

机译:肥胖和吸烟:我们可以只收一种税来抓两只鸟吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The debate on tobacco taxes and fat taxes often treats smoking and eating as independent behaviors. However, since there exists medical and sociological evidence aboutudthe interdependence between eating and smoking choices, antismoking policies may also affect the obesity prevalence and fat taxes could influence smoking behavior. We addressudthis issue from a theoretical standpoint and propose a dynamic rational model where eating and smoking are simultaneous choices that jointly affect body weight and addiction to smoking. Focusing on direct and cross price effects, we compare tobacco taxes and fat taxes and we show that a single policy tool can reduce both smoking and body weight. In particular, fat taxes can be more effective than tobacco taxes at simultaneously fighting obesity and smoking.
机译:关于烟草税和脂肪税的辩论通常将吸烟和饮食视为独立行为。但是,由于存在关于饮食与吸烟选择之间相互依存关系的医学和社会学证据,因此反吸烟政策也可能会影响肥胖率,而脂肪税可能会影响吸烟行为。我们从理论的角度解决这个问题,并提出一个动态的理性模型,其中饮食和吸烟是共同选择,共同影响体重和吸烟成瘾。着眼于直接和交叉价格影响,我们比较了烟草税和脂肪税,并且我们表明单一的政策工具可以减少吸烟和减轻体重。特别是,脂肪税在对抗肥胖和吸烟方面比烟草税更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号