首页> 外文OA文献 >Le processus de construction d’une GPEC-Territoriale : réflexion à partir de dispositifs de GPEC-Territoriale pilotée par la Chambre de métiers et de l’artisanat de Loir-et-Cher
【2h】

Le processus de construction d’une GPEC-Territoriale : réflexion à partir de dispositifs de GPEC-Territoriale pilotée par la Chambre de métiers et de l’artisanat de Loir-et-Cher

机译:建立GPEC领土的过程:卢瓦尔-谢尔省手工艺商会管理的GPEC领土系统的反思

摘要

Nowadays HRP is built increasingly on a territorial scale. Institutional actors from different backgrounds and varying size businesses work together to put in place actions that address issues related to employment, training, and skills. These approaches are sometimes in "hot", sometimes in "cold" depending on the circumstances, territories and stakeholders. The extension of the building of the HRP across a territory can be justified by taking into account several factors: internal or external to enterprises, policies, situational, socio-economic, etc. Thus through converging wills, multiple actors aspire to lift the limits and shortcomings related to HRP by using a HRP-Territorial. This new construction approach and analysis of HRP nevertheless raises several questions. Among the many questions we reflected about five of them: how do actors work together? What diagnosis allows to unite stakeholders around HRP-Territorial? How is this HRP-Territorial built in terms of phasing? How do actors agree on the construction and content of the actions of HRP-Territorial? How to mobilize actors in such collective approaches? These questions are taken from the main issue of our research: What is the process of building a HRP-Territorial involving institutional actors and businesses? We discussed and debated these issues on the basis of empirical data collected in two cases: HRP-Territorial in the Community of communes of Cher à la Loire and the HRP-Territorial in the timber Industry in Loir-et-Cher. Those data are collected by observation, qualitative interview, quantitative studies and documentaries. Theory of interaction, actor network theory, rational choice theory and mobilization theory served as our analytical framework. At the intersection of these approaches and these analyzes, it appears that the HRP-Territorial be built from a few necessities : the ability of the pilot to work together several actors, establishing a prior and shared diagnosis that rely on problem and challenges for companies and territory, mobilization of actors through selective incentives and analysis of priority categories of actors. Furthermore, it appears that the contents of the HRP-Territorial is continuously translated and obtained by relative consensus. Finally, and despite the particular case of each situation, a modeling phase of this construction is possible.
机译:如今,HRP越来越多地在领土范围内构建。来自不同背景和规模的企业的机构参与者共同努力,采取行动解决与就业,培训和技能有关的问题。根据情况,地区和利益相关者的不同,这些方法有时处于“热”状态,有时处于“冷”状态。可以通过考虑以下几个因素来证明在整个领土范围内扩展HRP的建设是合理的:企业内部或外部,政策,情况,社会经济等。因此,通过融合意志,多个参与者渴望解除限制并使用HRP领土与HRP有关的缺点。但是,这种新的构建方法和对HRP的分析提出了几个问题。在我们思考的五个问题中,有五个是:演员如何一起工作?什么诊断可以使HRP领土周围的利益相关者团结起来?该HRP领土如何按阶段构建?参与者如何就HRP领土行动的结构和内容达成共识?如何调动参与者采取这种集体方式?这些问题来自于我们研究的主要问题:建立一个由机构参与者和企业参与的HRP领土的过程是什么?我们基于在以下两种情况下收集到的经验数据讨论和辩论了这些问题:CheràLo Loire社区的HRP领土和Loir-et-Cher木材工业的HRP领土。这些数据是通过观察,定性访谈,定量研究和纪录片收集的。互动理论,参与者网络理论,理性选择理论和动员理论是我们的分析框架。在这些方法和这些分析的交叉点上,似乎可以从以下几方面建立HRP领土:飞行员具有与多个参与者合作的能力,建立基于公司和企业的问题和挑战的事先诊断和共享诊断。领土,通过选择性激励动员参与者和分析参与者的优先类别。此外,似乎HRP领土的内容是通过相对一致的方式连续翻译和获取的。最后,尽管每种情况都有特定的情况,但此构造的建模阶段是可能的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Houessou Benjamin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 fr
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号