首页> 外文OA文献 >Construire sa légitimité au quotidien : le travail micropolitique autour d'une Equipe Mobile de Psychiatrie-Précarité
【2h】

Construire sa légitimité au quotidien : le travail micropolitique autour d'une Equipe Mobile de Psychiatrie-Précarité

机译:每天建立合法性:围绕移动精神病学和car病团队的微观政治工作

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this dissertation, I examine the construction of the place of an Equipe Mobile de Psychiatrie-Précarité (EMPP), which is an outreach team for people with psychiatric disorders and with untraditionalliving arrangements. This construction is anaIyzed as the result from an ongoing work of distribution and legitimation of powers: a micropolitic work. In order to understand the micropolitic of the team's work and ils impact on the team's construction, I focus on key ¬moments in the process of ca. Re, in which it is questioned the boundary of the legitimacy of whether or not to intervene. Lnitially I describe the context in which the team was created and its functioning. Secondly, I analyse the important role played by demand, non-demand, and refusal in legitimating intervention in the midst of interaction between psychiatric team members, social workers, and service users. Lastly, the limits of the legitimacy to intervene are explored through three types of situation: when the team discharges a service user to another team, when constraint is used during the intervention, and when it is impossible to meet with the service user. Three modes of care are described (expertise, overpass, and complete). Bach represents possible configurations of the EMPP's place in the distribution of powers. Within each mode of care, specific interventions are legitimated and the EMPP establishes a balance between its specialized and non-specialized dimensions, and it positions itself as a restrictive or universalistic service provider. During this research, l was both a researcher and a team member, as a project assistant. Data was collected through participant observation, observant participation and interviews.
机译:在这篇论文中,我研究了精神病学-精神病康复医疗设备(EMPP)的所在地,这是一个为精神病患者和非传统生活安排的外展团队。正在进行的权力分配和合法化工作的结果是对这种结构的分析:微观政治工作。为了了解团队工作的微观政治及其对团队建设的影响,我将重点放在约稿过程中的关键时刻。再次,在其中有人质疑是否进行干预合法性的界限。最后,我描述了团队创建的背景及其功能。其次,我分析了需求,非需求和拒绝在精神科团队成员,社工和服务使用者之间的互动中使干预合法化的重要作用。最后,通过三种类型的情况来探讨干预合法性的局限性:当团队将服务用户解雇给另一个团队时,干预期间使用约束时以及无法与服务用户会面时。描述了三种护理模式(专业,立交和完全护理)。巴赫表示EMPP在电源分配中的位置的可能配置。在每种护理模式下,特定的干预措施都是合法的,并且EMPP在其专业和非专业领域之间建立平衡,并将其自身定位为限制性或普遍服务提供者。在这项研究期间,我既是研究人员,也是团队成员,并担任项目助理。通过参与者观察,观察者参与和访谈收集数据。

著录项

  • 作者

    marques ana;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 fr
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号