首页> 外文OA文献 >Le piémont géographique : essai pour une approche au prisme des interspatialités : étude croisée entre terrains alpin (Alpes franco-suisses) et carpatique (Roumanie)
【2h】

Le piémont géographique : essai pour une approche au prisme des interspatialités : étude croisée entre terrains alpin (Alpes franco-suisses) et carpatique (Roumanie)

机译:地理山麓:测试跨空间棱镜方法:高山(Franco-Swiss Alps)和卡帕蒂奇(罗马尼亚)地形之间的交叉研究

摘要

If the mountain is an object that has continued to support the geographical discipline and its developments, the issue of thresholds the mountain has remained relatively marginal. Yet a growing interest in these areas is noteworthy. Many concepts animating discipline (interface, interspatialités, intermediate spaces ...) push to reconsider these blurred areas, the threshold of "the kind of space" or spatial category what the mountain. It is in this context what this crossover study conducted between land North of the Alps in France and Switzerland and field of Romanian Carpathians. This threshold of the mountain foothills called here, can not emerge as exclusively physical or topographical criteria that have longer relevant in an increasingly rooted in the humanities discipline. The foothills can then be defined as the space on which deploys a set of functions called "foothill's functions". It is these features that this is to capture, define, in order to identify the players and explain the spatial and temporal dynamics. These are also the territorial logic and metropolitan which are to be questioned, as these "foothill's functions" can be as many development opportunities, but also of reconciliation competition between territories and / or between cities. Therefore, it is also the genesis and operation of territoriality and, specifically, the process of urbanization who must be considered when we look at these "foothill's functions". Finally, crossover study allows, at least to some extent, to consider the comparison, despite all the pitfalls and limitations that it presents. Emerging paradoxes of this comparison will then constitute elements that may better understand what can be the thresholds of the mountain, but also to propose a new approach to study these courses.
机译:如果说山峰是继续支持地理学科及其发展的对象,那么山峰的门槛问题仍然相对微不足道。然而,在这些领域的日益增长的关注是值得注意的。许多关于学科的概念(界面,空间间,中间空间……)推动人们重新考虑这些模糊的区域,“那种空间”的门槛或山峰的空间类别。在这种情况下,这项跨界研究是在法国和瑞士的阿尔卑斯山以北的土地与罗马尼亚喀尔巴阡山脉的田野之间进行的。这里所说的山麓丘陵的这个门槛,不能仅仅作为物理或地形学标准出现,而这些标准在与人文学科联系日益紧密的领域中就已经具有较长的相关性。然后可以将山麓小丘定义为在其上部署称为“山麓小丘功能”的一组功能的空间。这些特征是为了捕获,定义,识别玩家并解释空间和时间动态。这些也是要质疑的地域逻辑和大都市,因为这些“山麓小丘的功能”可以有许多发展机会,也可以是领土之间和/或城市之间的和解竞争。因此,当我们研究这些“山麓丘陵的功能”时,也必须考虑其领土的起源和运作,尤其是城市化的过程。最后,跨界研究至少可以在某种程度上考虑比较,尽管它存在所有的缺陷和局限性。这种比较中出现的新悖论将构成一些要素,这些要素可能会更好地理解什么可能是这座山的门槛,而且还会提出一种研究这些路线的新方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Merle Anthony;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 fr
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:24:42

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号