首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of Agar screen and duplex-PCR methods in determination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from nasal carriage
【2h】

Comparison of Agar screen and duplex-PCR methods in determination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from nasal carriage

机译:琼脂筛查和双重PCR方法测定从鼻支架分离出的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)菌株的比较

摘要

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains (MRSA) have become a serious health issue in engendering nosocomial infections. Due to the heterogeneity of this type of resistance, the conventional antibiotic susceptibility tests may fail to detect MRSA strains. The purpose of this research was to compare the phenotypic agar screen method with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detection of MRSA strains isolated from the nasal samples of hospital personnel. Totally, 52 coagulase positive S. aureus strains were isolated from nasal samples of 204 hospital personnel of Hajar Hospital affiliated to Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences. Susceptibility to oxacillin in the strains was evaluated by the phenotypic agar screen method. The presence of the methicillin resistance gene, mec A, was studied through duplex PCR method. The results of both methods were compared and the sensitivity and specificity of the methods were determined. Totally, 23 out of the 52 isolated S. aureus (44%) were phenotypically resistant to oxacillin, but 27 (52%) carried mecA gene. The sensitivity and specificity of the phenotypic agar screen method for determination of MRSA strains were found to be 81.5 and 96%, respectively. As compared to duplex PCR, oxacillin agar screen method is a simple, inexpensive, and practical phenotypic method with relatively low false positive results and thus may be suitable for verification of suspicious MRSA strains. However, for the relatively high false negative results, it may not be recommended for the primary screening of MRSA strains from the nasal samples of healthy carriers working at hospitals.
机译:耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌菌株(MRSA)在引起医院感染方面已成为严重的健康问题。由于这种抗药性的异质性,常规抗生素敏感性试验可能无法检测出MRSA菌株。这项研究的目的是将表型琼脂筛查方法与聚合酶链反应(PCR)进行比较,以检测从医院人员鼻腔样本中分离出的MRSA菌株。总共从Shahrekord医科大学附属的Hajar医院的204名医院工作人员的鼻样本中分离出52株凝固酶阳性的金黄色葡萄球菌。通过表型琼脂筛选法评估菌株对奥沙西林的敏感性。通过双重PCR方法研究了甲氧西林抗性基因mec A的存在。比较了两种方法的结果,并确定了方法的敏感性和特异性。总计,在52株分离的金黄色葡萄球菌中,有23株(44%)在表型上对奥沙西林耐药,但27株(52%)带有mecA基因。表型琼脂筛查法测定MRSA菌株的敏感性和特异性分别为81.5和96%。与双重PCR相比,奥沙西林琼脂筛选方法是一种简单,廉价且实用的表型方法,假阳性结果相对较低,因此可能适用于可疑MRSA菌株的验证。但是,由于假阴性结果相对较高,因此不建议从医院工作的健康携带者鼻腔样本中初步筛查MRSA菌株。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号