首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of the performance of Disk diffusion, Agar screening and E-test methods with Real- time PCR for the detection of methicillin resistant coagulase negative Staphylococcus strains isolated from clinical samples of Shahrekord university hospitals, 2008
【2h】

Comparison of the performance of Disk diffusion, Agar screening and E-test methods with Real- time PCR for the detection of methicillin resistant coagulase negative Staphylococcus strains isolated from clinical samples of Shahrekord university hospitals, 2008

机译:2008年从Shahrekord大学医院临床样本中分离出的耐甲氧西林凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌菌株的Disk Disc扩散,琼脂筛查和E-test方法与实时PCR的性能比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Backgroundud: Coagulase Negative staphylococci (CoNS) are nosocomial pathogens. The main objectiveudof the study was to compare the performance of disk diffusion, E-test and agar screening methods withudReal-time PCR technique for detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase negative staphylococciud(MRCoNS), using Taqman® Real-time PCR for mecA DV WKH ³ JROG VWDQ GDUG´ FRP SDULVRQ DVVD � udMethodsud: 88 coagulase negative Staphylococcus isolates were identified out of 284 Staphylococcus isolatesudcollected from Hajar and Kashani hospitals-shahrekod, Iran. Methicillin resistance strains were identified byudseveral methods: Disk diffusion, Agar screening, E-test and Real-time PCR. The results of the tested methodsudZHUH FRP SDUHG ZLWK WKRVH RI WKH 5 HDO� WLP H 3& 5 E & KL VTX DUH RU ) LVKHU¶ V H[ DFW WHVWV� udResultsud: Of the 88 coagulase negative Staphylococcus isolates tested, 46 isolates (52.3%) were mecAud-udpositive and 42 isolates (47.7%) were mecA-negative. The results of all the tested methods had a statisticallyudsignificant agreement with those of Real-time PCR. The E-test was 100% sensitive and specific for mecAudpresence. The sensitivity and specificity of oxacillin agar screen (6.0 µg/ml) method were 96% and 98%,udrespectively and the sensitivity and specificity of oxacillin Disk diffusion method were 91% and 90%,udrespectively.udConclusion: In the present study, E-test is proposed as the best phenotypic method. In case economicudissue matters, the oxacillin agar screening method (6.0 µg/ml), which is suitable for the detection ofudMRCoNS due to its accuracy and low cost, is recommended.udKeywordsud: methicilli
机译:背景 ud:凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CoNS)是医院病原体。本研究的主要目的是使用Taqman®Real-Real-PCR技术比较磁盘扩散,E检验和琼脂筛选方法与udPCR的实时荧光定量PCR技术检测凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌udc耐药性mecA DV WKH³JROG VWDQ GDUG´ FRP SDULVRQ DVVD的时间PCR ududs ud:从伊朗Hajar和Kashani医院-shahrekod收集的284种葡萄球菌中,鉴定出88种凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌。甲氧西林抗药性菌株通过多种方法鉴定:圆盘扩散,琼脂筛选,E检验和实时PCR。测试方法的结果 udZHUH FRP SDUHG ZLWK WKRVH RI WKH 5HDO�WLP H 3&5 E &KL VTX DUH RU}LVKHU¶VH [DFWWHVWV� ud结果 ud:在88个经测试的凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌分离物中, mecA ud- udative阳性的有46株(52.3%),mecA阴性的有42株(47.7%)。所有测试方法的结果与实时PCR的结果在统计上无关紧要。 E检验对mecA 不存在具有100%的敏感性和特异性。奥沙西林琼脂筛查法(6.0 µg / ml)的敏感性和特异性分别为96%和98%,奥沙西林圆盘扩散法的敏感性和特异性分别为91%和90%。 ud结论:目前在研究中,E-test被认为是最好的表型方法。如果涉及经济 udissue方面,建议使用奥沙西林琼脂筛选方法(6.0 µg / ml),由于其准确性和低成本,因此适合于 udMRCoNS的检测。 ud关键字 ud:methicilli

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号