首页> 外文OA文献 >The comparison of two methods of hemostasis in bleeding during surgery of soft tissue upper limb
【2h】

The comparison of two methods of hemostasis in bleeding during surgery of soft tissue upper limb

机译:软组织上肢手术中两种止血方法的比较

摘要

Background: mechanical, thermal or chemical homeostasis is required to stop bleeding during surgery.The purpose of this study is to compare two method of hemostasis in bleeding rate during surgery of soft tissuie upper limb. Materials and Methods: In this case - control study 80 patients with inclusion criteria(age under50,without abdominal trauma,BMI less than30 and without soft tissue damage)that were operated by a surgen with available sampling (regarding to inclusion criteria, age and sex ) non randomly divided into two groups of case and control and intervention in case group was base on causing hemostasis with electrocautery and tourniquet, but in control group, on electrocautery to cause homeostasis from beginning of operating tourniquet was used.Volume of lost blood was based on the number of used gases and suction was not used for any cases. Data collected by questionnaire and were analyzed by SPSS software and descriptive- analytic statistics. Results: Mean age of case group was 31.62± 8/54 years and control group was 29.9±8.05 year. There was not a significant age difference between two groups(p=0.6). 63.8% of samples were men and and 36.2% were women . Most of surgical cases was related to repairing of ruptured flexor tendons of forearm (37.5%).The least was related to cyst and foreign bodies (12.5%). Tourniquet Mean time in case and control groups were 27.87±4.3 and 29.4±6.6 respectively and mean lost blood volume in case and control group were 16.3±5.3 and 17.2±4.7 respectively but there was no significant statistical difference in two groups(p=0.1). Conclusion: Tissue necrosis is a serious complication of Electro-cautery, so it is better to limit the use of Electro-cautery in soft tissue operations. But more researches are needed to confirm these results.
机译:背景:手术过程中需要机械,热或化学稳态来止血。本研究的目的是比较软组织上肢手术中两种止血方法的出血率。材料和方法:在这种情况下-对照研究80例纳入标准(年龄在50岁以下,无腹部创伤,BMI小于30且无软组织损伤)的患者由一名外科医师进行手术,并提供了可用的样本(根据纳入标准,年龄和性别)非随机分为两组,对照组和介入治疗以病例组为基础,通过电灼和止血带引起止血,而对照组则采用电灼术从止血带开始就达到稳态,以失血量为基础在任何情况下都不会使用所用气体的数量和吸力。通过问卷调查收集的数据并通过SPSS软件和描述性分析统计数据进行分析。结果:病例组平均年龄为31.62±8/54岁,对照组为29.9±8.05岁。两组之间的年龄差异无统计学意义(p = 0.6)。男性占63.8%,女性占36.2%。大多数外科手术病例与前臂屈肌腱断裂的修复有关(37.5%),而与囊肿和异物有关的最少(12.5%)。止血带病例组和对照组的平均时间分别为27.87±4.3和29.4±6.6,病例组和对照组的平均失血量分别为16.3±5.3和17.2±4.7,但两组之间无统计学差异(p = 0.1) )。结论:组织坏死是电灼的严重并发症,因此最好限制在软组织手术中使用电灼。但是需要更多的研究来证实这些结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号