首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparing of retention of cast crowns cemented with two kind of permanent cement with and without prier use of temporary cement
【2h】

Comparing of retention of cast crowns cemented with two kind of permanent cement with and without prier use of temporary cement

机译:比较两种有无临时使用水泥的永久性水泥粘结的铸冠的固位力

摘要

Introduction: This study evaluated the effects of eugenol –free temporary cement remnants on theudretentive strength of casting crowns luted via zinc phosphate and resin cement (Maxcem) to theudtooth structure.udMaterial and methods: 40 extracted human molars ware randomly divided into 2 groups. eachudgroup was then divided into 2 subgroups and the teeth were paired so that the size of each tooth inudeach subgroup was the same as a tooth in the other subgroups. 40 standardized Ni-cr completeudcrowns were made on teeth prepared with a milling machine using conventional laboratoryudtechniques. For each adhesive system, in one subgroups a provisional restoration was cementedudusing an eugenol –free temporary cement. Temporary crown was remained on the tooth structureudfor an hour and then extracted and cement remnant was removed by an excavator. Then the casingudcrowns were adhesively luted via zinc phosphate, adhesive resin(Maxcem) to prepared teeth. Afterud24h storage in distilled water, Retention was evaluated by measuring the tensile force required touddislodge the crowns from tooth preparations with a universal testing machine after thermo cyclingud(1500 cycles between 5c and 55c with 1- minute dwell times). The data were analyzed by means ofudpaired T-test and wilcoxon test in SPSS software version 11.5udResults: The analysis showed the mean retentive strength for 2 subgroups with and without prioruduse of temporary cement in the maxcem group was 176 ± 55 and 274 ± 169 N, there was not audsignificant difference between the 2 subgroups. (p value = 0.174). And the mean retentive strengthudfor 2 subgroups with and without prior use of temporary cement in the zincphosphate group wasud257 ± 125 and 238 ± 135 N, there was not significan t difference between the 2 subgroups (p valueud= 0.782).udDiscussion: The use of an eugenol –free temporary cement does not alter the retentive strength ofudcasting restorations lutted to prepared teeth using the tested adhesive system, when temporaryudcements are removed properly.
机译:简介:本研究评估了不含丁香酚的临时水泥残留物对通过磷酸锌和树脂水泥(Maxcem)侵蚀到牙齿结构的铸造牙冠的保持力的影响。 ud材料和方法:40颗提取的人类磨牙器随机分配分为2组。然后将每个 udgroup分为2个子组,并将牙齿配对,以便 udeach子组中的每个牙齿的大小与其他子组中的牙齿相同。使用常规实验室 udtechniques在铣床制备的牙齿上制作40个标准化的Ni-cr完整王冠。对于每个胶粘剂系统,在一个子组中使用无丁香酚的临时胶粘剂进行临时修复。临时牙冠在牙齿结构上停留一个小时,然后取出,并用挖掘机去除残留的水泥。然后通过磷酸锌,粘合树脂(Maxcem)将外壳皇冠上的胶粘剂粘合到准备好的牙齿上。在蒸馏水中储存24小时后,通过在热循环后(在5c和55c之间进行1500次循环,停留时间为1分钟),使用通用测试仪测量从牙准备中去除牙冠所需的拉力来评估固位力。通过SPSS软件11.5版中的 tpaired T检验和wilcoxon检验对数据进行了分析结果。结果:分析显示,maxcem组中有和没有事先使用临时水泥的2个亚组的平均保持强度为176±55 274±169 N,两个亚组之间没有显着差异。 (p值= 0.174)。磷酸锌组中有和没有使用临时水泥的2个亚组的平均保持强度 ud为 ud257±125和238±135 N,这两个亚组之间无显着性差异(p值 ud = 0.782) 。 udDiscussion:如果适当地去除了临时胶泥,则使用不含丁香酚的临时胶粘剂不会改变使用经测试的粘合系统稀释到准备好的牙齿上的 udcasting修复物的保持强度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号