首页> 外文OA文献 >Reassessing the Mozart Effect: Musicians and Non-Musicians Respond Differently to Late Eighteenth-Century, Non-Texted Music for a Monochromatic Instrument
【2h】

Reassessing the Mozart Effect: Musicians and Non-Musicians Respond Differently to Late Eighteenth-Century, Non-Texted Music for a Monochromatic Instrument

机译:重新评估莫扎特效应:音乐家和非音乐家对18世纪晚期单色乐器的非文本音乐的反应不同

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recent accumulating evidence suggests a relationship between music and spatial-reasoning. One particular link:, the termed u22Mozart effect,u22 is an enhancement in performance on spatial-reasoning tasks after listening to the ftrst movement of a sonata by Mozart. Though some studies offer additional evidence to support the u22Mozart effect,u22 it is interesting that a number of studies attempting to reproduce it have failed. Accordingly, this study investigated the u22Mozart effectu22 using an alternative means of assessing spatial-reasoning ability. Additionally, the music of Haydn was used in an effort to reproduce the effect. Lastly, a differentiation was made between the scores of musicians and non-musicians. No significant differences were found in scores among conditions of Mozart, Silence, or Haydn. However, a marginally significant interaction was found between musician groups and stimulus groups. Additionally, when lumped together, musicians scored higher after listening to music and non-musicians scored higher after listening to silence. The trends found in this study offer an explanation for why previous research has failed to find an enhancement, as the differences in scores between musicians and non-musicians apparently cancel out when the two groups are combined .
机译:最近积累的证据表明音乐与空间推理之间的关系。一个特定的链接,称为“莫扎特效应”,是在听了莫扎特的奏鸣曲的第一声运动后,在空间推理任务上的性能增强。尽管一些研究提供了其他证据来支持莫扎特效应,但有趣的是,许多尝试复制莫扎特效应的研究都失败了。因此,本研究使用另一种评估空间推理能力的方法研究了莫扎特效应。此外,还使用了海顿的音乐来重现这种效果。最后,对音乐家和非音乐家的分数进行了区分。在莫扎特,沉默或海顿的条件下,得分没有发现显着差异。但是,在音乐家群体和刺激群体之间发现了微弱的相互作用。此外,当混在一起时,音乐家在听音乐后得分更高,而非音乐家在听沉默后得分更高。这项研究中发现的趋势提供了一个解释,说明了为什么先前的研究未能找到增强的原因,因为当音乐家和非音乐家之间的得分差异明显时,将两者结合起来就可以抵消。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cooper u2797 William B.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1997
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号