首页> 外文OA文献 >Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Wheat High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits by SDS-PAGE, RP-HPLC, HPCE, and MALDI-TOF-MS
【2h】

Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Wheat High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits by SDS-PAGE, RP-HPLC, HPCE, and MALDI-TOF-MS

机译:小麦高分子量谷蛋白亚基的SDS-PAGE,RP-HPLC,HPCE和MALDI-TOF-MS表征与比较分析

摘要

High molecular weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GS) from 60 germplasms including 30 common wheat cultivars and 30 related species were separated and characterized by a suite of separation methods including sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC), high-performance capillary electrophoresis (HPCE), and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS). Comparative analysis demonstrated that each methodology has its own advantages and disadvantages, The main drawback of SIDS-PAGE was its overestimation of molecular mass and incorrect identification of HMW-GS due to its low resolution. However, it had the advantages of technical simplicity and low requirements of equipment; thus, it is suitable for large-scale and high-throughput HMW-GS screening for breeding programs, especially when the glutenin composition is clear in the breeding material. MALDI-TOF-MS clearly expressed many technical advantages among the four methods evaluated, including high throughput, high resolution, and accuracy; it was, however, associated with high equipment cost, thus preventing many breeding companies from accessing the technology. RP-HPLC and HPCE were found to be intermediate between SIDS-PAGE and MALDI-TOF-MS. Both RP-HPLC and HPCE demonstrated higher resolution and reproducibility over SDS-PAGE but lower detection power than MALDI-TOF-MS. Results demonstrated that MALDI-TOF-MS is suitable for analyzing HMW-GS for routine breeding line screening and for identifying new genotypes.
机译:从包括30个普通小麦品种和30个相关种在内的60个种质中分离出高分子量谷蛋白亚基(HMW-GS),并通过一套分离方法进行了表征,包括十二烷基硫酸钠-聚丙烯酰胺凝胶电泳(SDS-PAGE),反相高高效液相色谱(RP-HPLC),高效毛细管电泳(HPCE)和基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF-MS)。比较分析表明,每种方法都有其优点和缺点。SIDS-PAGE的主要缺点是其分子量过高,以及HMW-GS的分辨率低,因此无法正确识别HMW-GS。但是,它具有技术简单和设备要求低的优点。因此,它适合用于育种程序的大规模,高通量HMW-GS筛选,尤其是当育种材料中的谷蛋白成分清晰时。 MALDI-TOF-MS清楚地表达了所评估的四种方法中的许多技术优势,包括高通量,高分辨率和准确性。然而,这与高昂的设备成本有关,因此阻止了许多育种公司使用该技术。发现RP-HPLC和HPCE在SIDS-PAGE和MALDI-TOF-MS之间。 RP-HPLC和HPCE均显示出比SDS-PAGE更高的分离度和重现性,但检测能力却低于MALDI-TOF-MS。结果表明,MALDI-TOF-MS适用于分析HMW-GS,以进行常规育种系筛选和鉴定新基因型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号