首页> 外文OA文献 >How Heavy Is A Job?: A Critical Survey of Job Evaluation as a Payment Device.
【2h】

How Heavy Is A Job?: A Critical Survey of Job Evaluation as a Payment Device.

机译:工作有多重?:对工作评估作为一种支付手段的批判性调查。

摘要

With salaries subjected to scrutiny more than ever, it is increasingly important that the process by which they are determined be understood and justifiable. Both public and private organisations now routinely rely on so-called “job evaluation” as a means of constructing an appropriate pay-scale and as such it is ever more necessary that we appreciate how this system works and that we recognise its limits. Only with such an understanding of the way in which salaries are set can we hope to have a meaningful discussion of their economic function. This paper aims to expound the details of job evaluation both in theory and inudpractice, and critically assess its shortcomings. In Section 1 below we describe the job evaluation system and in Section 2 we briefly outline the history and the usage of the system in both the private and the public sector. In Section 3 we theoretically analyse the often unstated but nonetheless implicit assumptions made by practitioners of the art of job evaluation. Section 4 applies the analysis of Section 3 to review a particular and important case study, namely The Senior Salaries Review of the Welsh Assembly 2004. Section 5 concludes.
机译:随着薪金比以往受到更多的审查,越来越重要的是,对薪金的确定过程进行理解和合理化。现在,公共和私人组织都通常依靠所谓的“工作评估”来构建适当的薪资表,因此,我们越来越需要了解该系统的工作原理并意识到其局限性。只有对工资的设定方式有这样的了解,我们才能希望对工资的经济功能进行有意义的讨论。本文旨在从理论上和实践上阐述工作评估的细节,并严格评估其缺点。在下面的第1节中,我们描述了工作评估系统,在第2节中,我们简要概述了该系统在私营和公共部门中的历史和使用情况。在第3节中,我们从理论上分析了工作评估领域的从业人员经常未阐明但仍隐含的假设。第4节应用第3节的分析来回顾一个特定而重要的案例研究,即2004年威尔士议会的高级薪资审查。第5节总结。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号