首页> 外文OA文献 >Evidence-based budgetary policy : speaking truth to power?
【2h】

Evidence-based budgetary policy : speaking truth to power?

机译:循证预算政策:对权力说真话?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The relationship between policy analysis and public budgeting has spurred quite some debate since the1960s when Robert McNamara, Secretary of Defense in the Kennedy administration, launched his Planning Programming Budgeting System (PPBS) in an effort to improve the allocation of resources and efficiency in the public sector. More recently, we have witnessed a revival of performance budgeting due to the New Public Management (NPM) movement, which may be considered as a vehicle to serve old wine in a new bottle. The bouquet is fine as the negotiations about next year’s budget are now flavored by performance information. However, the aftertaste is somewhat backward as the constraints of performance budgeting have become clear. In this paper we look back at the 50- year history of budgetary reform to assess the progress that we have made since the first efforts to establish a more evidence-based fiscal policy. At the end, we conclude that budgets are still largely decided by power rather than by truth, or evidence that something works.
机译:自1960年代以来,肯尼迪政府国防部长罗伯特·麦克纳马拉(Robert McNamara)推出其规划编程预算系统(PPBS)以来,政策分析与公共预算之间的关系引起了很多争论,以改善公共资源和效率的分配。部门。最近,由于新公共管理(NPM)运动,我们目睹了绩效预算的复兴,该运动可以被认为是在新瓶中提供旧酒的工具。效果很好,因为有关效果的信息现在可以使有关明年预算的谈判更加有趣。但是,由于绩效预算的限制已经很清楚,因此回味有些落后。在本文中,我们回顾了预算改革的50年历史,以评估自从我们首次建立更加循证的财政政策以来所取得的进展。最后,我们得出结论,预算仍主要由权力而不是由真理或证明有效的证据决定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号