首页> 外文OA文献 >Institutional responsibility for private military and security contractors
【2h】

Institutional responsibility for private military and security contractors

机译:私营军事和安全承包商的机构责任

摘要

This chapter analyses the issue of legal responsibility arising from the trend among international organizations to use the services of private actors within peace operations. It has been argued in the literature that suitably controlled and regulated the use of contractors by the United Nations, European Union, and other organizations would bring significant benefits, not only in terms of cost-savings but also in terms of a removal of institutional dependence on voluntary and often under-equipped contributions from member states. While recognising the benefits to organizations that the greater use of contractors might bring, the chapter is concerned with issues of accountability and access to justice when human rights abuse has been committed by contractors. For the purposes of attribution of wrongful acts and omissions, it considers whether the effective control test is the most appropriate one for private contractors working for organizations or for troops contributing nations involved in institutionally mandated peace operations.
机译:本章分析了国际组织在和平行动中利用私人行为者的服务的趋势引起的法律责任问题。文献中指出,联合国,欧洲联盟和其他组织适当控制和规范承包商的使用将带来巨大的好处,不仅在节省成本方面,而且在消除对机构的依赖方面成员国自愿提供的和经常配备不足的捐款。尽管认识到更多地使用承包商可能给组织带来好处,但本章关注的是承包商滥用人权时的问责制和诉诸司法的问题。为了归因于不法行为和不作为,委员会考虑了有效的控制测试是否最适合于为组织工作的私营承包商或为参与机构授权的和平行动的派遣部队的部队。

著录项

  • 作者

    WHITE Nigel D.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号