首页> 外文OA文献 >An American Model for the EU Gas Market?
【2h】

An American Model for the EU Gas Market?

机译:欧盟天然气市场的美国模式?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is generally believed that the American model is not suitable for Europe, yet North America is theonly large and working competitive gas market in the world. The paper shows how its model could beadapted as a target for market design within the European institutional framework.It starts from analysis of the main peculiar economic features of the gas transportation industry, whichshould underpin any efficient model. After the Third Package is properly implemented the EU willshare several building blocks of the American model: effective unbundling of transportation andsupply; regulated tariffs which, for long distance transportation, are in fact largely related to capacityand distance; investments based mostly on industry’s initiative and resources, and the related decisionsare increasingly made after open and public processes.Yet Europe needs to harmonize tariff regulation criteria, which could be achieved through amonitoring process. National separation of main investment decisions should be overcome, possiblyby organising a common platform where market forces and public authorities interact with privatesuppliers to require existing and develop new capacity, whereas industry competitively offers itssolutions. Such platform would allow for long term capacity reservation, subject to caps andcongestion management provisions. Auctions and possibly market coupling would play an importantrole in the allocation of short term capacity but a limited one in long term.Market architecture and the organisation of hubs would also be developed mostly by market forcesunder regulatory oversight. The continental nature of the market suggests a likely concentration oftrading in a very limited number of main markets, whereas minor markets would have a limited roleand would be connected to major ones, with price differences reflecting transportation costs andmarket conditions. Excessive interference or pursuit of political goals in less than transparent waysinvolves the risk of slower liquidity development and higher market fragmentation.With this view as a background, regulatory work aimed at completing the European market should bebased on ensuring the viability of interconnections between current markets and on the establishmentof common platforms and co-ordinated tariff systems, fostering the conditions for upstream andtransportation capacity development.
机译:人们普遍认为,美国模式不适合欧洲,但北美是世界上唯一的大型且可竞争的天然气市场。本文说明了其模型如何适合作为欧洲制度框架内的市场设计目标,它从分析天然气运输行业的主要特殊经济特征开始,这应该成为任何有效模型的基础。妥善实施“第三揽子计划”后,欧盟将分享美国模式的几个基本组成部分:有效地将运输和供应捆绑在一起;对于长途运输而言,监管关税实际上与运力和距离有关;投资主要基于行业的主动性和资源,并且在公开和公开的程序之后越来越多地做出相关的决定。然而,欧洲需要统一关税监管标准,这可以通过监督程序来实现。应该克服主要投资决策的国家分离的问题,可能是通过组织一个共同的平台,在这个平台上市场力量和公共机构与私人供应商互动以要求现有的和发展新的能力,而工业竞争地提供其解决方案。这样的平台将允许长期容量保留,但要遵守上限和拥塞管理规定。拍卖和可能的市场耦合将在短期容量分配中发挥重要作用,但在长期容量分配中将发挥有限的作用。市场架构和枢纽的组织也将主要由市场力量在监管监督下发展。市场的大陆性质表明,交易可能集中在数量非常有限的主要市场中,而次要市场的作用有限并且与主要市场相关,价格差异反映了运输成本和市场状况。过度干预或以不透明的方式追求政治目标会带来流动性发展缓慢和市场分化加剧的风险。以此为背景,旨在完善欧洲市场的监管工作应基于确保当前市场与市场之间相互联系的可行性。建立共同的平台和协调的关税制度,为上游和运输能力的发展创造条件。

著录项

  • 作者

    ASCARI Sergio;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号