首页> 外文OA文献 >Religious norms in the public sphere : proceedings of a conference held at UC Berkeley on May 6-7, 2011
【2h】

Religious norms in the public sphere : proceedings of a conference held at UC Berkeley on May 6-7, 2011

机译:公共领域的宗教规范:2011年5月6日至7日在加州大学伯克利分校举行的会议纪要

摘要

The recent years have seen, in the West, an increasing debate on the presence of religious symbols in the public sphere (crucifix in Italy, minaret in Switzerland, veil and burqa in France, mosques, Ten Commandments and even Christmas trees in the USA, etc.). Most of the cases ended in court decisions, either local courts, supreme courts or the European Court of Human Rights, but with no clear results in terms of defining a coherent management of religious signs in public sphere. Why this increasing tensions and criminalization of the debate on religion? Is this the consequence of a growing secularization that aims at eradicating any remnants of religion, or, on the contrary, a “return of the sacred” that tries to reconquer the public sphere? Are we witnessing a clash of civilizations, where traditional cultures fight against newcomers (Islam in the West) by re-asserting a religious identity more than a religious faith? Is this more a conflict of religiosities, that is of personal experiencing of faith, where new believers (converts and born-again) strive to exhibit their faith more than to insert it in inconspicuous social practices? In any case, the debate has far reaching consequences: if the courts have to decide about religious signs, they have also to define what a religious sign is, and by consequence what is a religion, although most national constitutions prevent the state to interfere with theology and internal organization of faith communities.
机译:近年来,在西方国家,关于宗教符号在公共领域的存在的辩论越来越多(意大利的耶稣受难像,瑞士的尖塔,法国的面纱和布加勒舞,清真寺,十诫甚至美国的圣诞树,等等。)。大多数案件以地方法院,最高法院或欧洲人权法院的法院判决告终,但在界定公共领域宗教标志的统一管理方面没有明确的结果。为什么对宗教辩论的紧张局势日益加剧并被定为刑事犯罪?这是否是旨在消除宗教残余的日益世俗化的结果,还是相反,试图征服公共领域的“神圣的回归”?我们是否正在目睹文明的冲突,在传统文化中,传统文化通过重新主张一种宗教身份而不是一种宗教信仰来与新来者(西方的伊斯兰教)作斗争?这是否更像是一种宗教冲突,是个人的信仰体验,新信徒(vert依和信徒)再次努力表现出自己的信仰,而不是将其插入不起眼的社会实践中?无论如何,辩论都会产生深远的影响:如果法院必须决定宗教标志,他们还必须定义什么是宗教标志,结果是什么是宗教,尽管大多数国家宪法都禁止国家干预。信仰社区的神学和内部组织。

著录项

  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号