Social Security and Health Services in EU Law: Towards Convergence or Divergence in Competition State Aids and Free Movement?

摘要

With this paper I maintain that the regulation of social security and healthcare in EU law revolvesaround the quest for a right balance between conflicting interests, involving the issues of social rights,State and Market, distribution of competences.In particular, the analysis of the way in which the ECJ legally frames the so called public/privatedivide permits to underline the emergence of relevant dissonances in the jurisprudence concerning thethree sectors of competition, free movement and State aids.The rationale behind some of such divergences pertain to the existence of natural asymmetries onwhich evolve and take shape the constitutive elements of the European economic and socialconstitution. In this sense, the lack of convergence is not undesirable per se. On the contrary, itdepends on the different role and function exercised by the solidarity principle on one hand and on therelevance of the public financing of social services on the other hand, in their interplay with the choicebetween abandon or revaluation of a (more or less) idealtpic public/private dichotomy. At the centre ofthe analysis is the full incorporation or, alternatively, attenuation, in the field of social security andhealthcare, of the functional approach adopted in relation to the notion of economic activity.Some other divergences, however, are not justifiable. That is to say that in some cases there seems toemerge a need for a rapprochement between competition, free movement and States aids. Thisconcerns the concept of general (economic?) interest and its potential intervention as a method ofpositive market and rights integration.Finally, the paper intends to highlight that at the core of the EU discourse is the pursuit of (and thequest for) a “healthy” interaction and relationship between individual free movement rights, socialrights and State redistributive autonomy for the management of national social security and healthcaresystems. In this respect, I will underline role, function and potentialities of Art. 106.2 TFEU as theappropriate sedes materiae to balance public interest’s aims and values with market principles anddemands, both considered as constitutive elements, respectively, of the EU social and economicconstitution.