首页> 外文OA文献 >The House that Market Socialism Built: Reform, Consumption and Inequality in Socialist Yugoslavia
【2h】

The House that Market Socialism Built: Reform, Consumption and Inequality in Socialist Yugoslavia

机译:市场社会主义建造的房子:社会主义南斯拉夫的改革,消费和不平等

摘要

Scholars have argued that Eastern European socialist regimes found themselves forced to compete with the capitalist consumerist model showcased in West Germany in order to maintain their legitimacy in the eyes of the population. Yugoslavia, however, did decide to prioritize consumer needs and scrap central planning in favor of a consumerdriven economy. How did these economic reforms fare? Focusing on the formulation of housing policy, its marketing, and its reception in the press, this study sheds light on the possibility of consumer-driven reforms in a socialist state. Although the economic policies and priorities pursued starting in 1957 yielded a general increase in personal consumption, these increases were not equitably shared in the area of housing, with unskilled and semiskilled workers being left in the cold. This fact was ideologically problematic for a regime whose legitimacy was founded on the promise of an egalitarian workers’ society. Rather than pulling back to more controlled economic conditions, policy-makers pushed forwards with even more radical liberalizing reforms, which they justified with the promise of greater equality through increased access to personal consumption. However, popular opinion disapproved of these reforms, because it perceived that they only benefited a privileged stratum of the population. In response, policy-makers did not retract the reforms, but merely buffered the margins of this consumer society – discarding the idea of luxury housing as politically unacceptable, and adopting a program of social housing for those shut out of the housing market.
机译:学者们争辩说,东欧社会主义政权发现自己不得不与西德展示的资本主义消费主义模式竞争,以维持其在民众眼中的合法性。但是,南斯拉夫确实决定优先考虑消费者需求,并放弃了以消费者为导向的经济的中央计划。这些经济改革的进展如何?该研究着重于住房政策的制定,市场营销及其在媒体上的接受程度,从而揭示了在社会主义国家中以消费者为主导的改革的可能性。尽管从1957年开始实行的经济政策和优先事项总体上增加了个人消费,但住房领域并没有公平地分享这些增长,非技术工人和半技术工人被冷落了。对于一个其合法性建立在平等工人社会的承诺基础上的政权而言,这一事实在思想上是有问题的。决策者们并没有退回到更加可控的经济状况,而是推动了更为激进的自由化改革,他们提出了通过增加个人消费获得更大平等的承诺。但是,公众舆论不同意这些改革,因为它认为这些改革只会使人口的特权阶层受益。作为回应,决策者们没有撤消改革,只是缓冲了这个消费社会的利润-放弃了在政治上不可接受的豪华住房的想法,并为那些被住房市场拒之门外的人们采用了社会住房计划。

著录项

  • 作者

    LE NORMAND Brigitte;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号