首页> 外文OA文献 >Understanding agricultural price range systems as trade restraints : 'Peru–agricultural products'
【2h】

Understanding agricultural price range systems as trade restraints : 'Peru–agricultural products'

机译:将农产品价格范围体系理解为贸易限制:“秘鲁农产品”

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An agricultural price range system (PRS) aims to stabilize local prices in an open economy via the use of import duties that vary with international prices. The policy is inherently distortionary and welfare-reducing for a small open economy, at least according to the canonical economic model. We offer an explanation for why a government concerned with national welfare may nevertheless implement such a policy when faced with risk aversion and imperfect insurance markets. We also highlight open questions arising out of the Peru – Agricultural Products dispute for the WTO’s Appellate Body to address in order to clarify how a PRS consistent with WTO rules could be designed. Finally, we discuss the possibility that a WTO member might resort to a free trade agreement (FTA) to preserve its flexibility to implement a PRS and how an FTA provision of this sort ought to be treated in WTO litigation.
机译:农业价格范围系统(PRS)旨在通过使用随国际价格而变化的进口关税来稳定开放经济中的本地价格。至少根据规范的经济模型,对于小型开放经济体而言,该政策固有地是扭曲性的,并且会减少福利。我们提供一个解释,说明在面对风险规避和不完善的保险市场时,关心国民福利的政府为何仍会实施这样的政策。我们还重点介绍了秘鲁–农产品争端引起的未解决问题,世贸组织上诉机构需要解决,以阐明如何设计符合世贸组织规则的PRS。最后,我们讨论了WTO成员可能诉诸自由贸易协定(FTA)来保持其实施PRS的灵活性的可能性,以及在WTO诉讼中应如何对待此类FTA条款。

著录项

  • 作者

    SAGGI Kamal; WU Mark;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号