首页> 外文OA文献 >The Business of Development - How Market-Oriented State Policies influence Danish NGOs
【2h】

The Business of Development - How Market-Oriented State Policies influence Danish NGOs

机译:发展业务-市场导向的国家政策如何影响丹麦的非政府组织

摘要

AbstractNon-Governmental Organizations [NGOs] represent civil society and navigate between the stateand the market trying to survive while not going against their values. This report examines thechanged funding policies of 2005 from Danida towards Danish NGOs in regards to informationalactivities and own-contribution. The report asks why this funding has been changed, when NGOsare vital in informing the public, and what the consequences are for the NGOs.The first analysis explores the background to the policy changes, examining how marketrationalities and state priorities are recognizable in the policies. This examination is initiatedthrough findings on how levels of aid has witnessed a change in 2001, suddenly reflecting howinternational aid levels fluctuate according to ideology, and on the trend towards lesser knowledgeabout development in the Danish public. The analysis draws on theory describing the evolvement ofinternational development policies and on theoretical inputs on the importance of domesticpriorities in development policy, in order to examine how international and domestic ideologies areinfluencing the Danish policy. The second analysis, examines the changing organizational structureof NGOs as a consequence of the policies of 2005. Through theory from organizational researchand interviews with key persons from Danish development NGOs the influence from the marketand the state is explored.It is concluded that the reasons for the changed policies must be seen in light of the lower prioritiesgiven to development aid in general after 2001, the influence of domestically-oriented politicalparties, and the ideological opinion that increased competition on market terms constitutes the mostefficient way to secure public opinion for NGOs. This report finds that although public support toNGOs has gone up, a simultaneous decline in public knowledge on development has taken place.Furthermore it is concluded that although NGOs have increased market-oriented strategies to securefunding, they have not necessarily gone against their values. However, there seems to be reason forconcern looking at how the state controls NGOs while transferring market rationalities through NewPublic Management instruments.
机译:摘要非政府组织(NGOs)代表公民社会,在国家和市场之间徘徊,试图在不违背其价值观的前提下生存。本报告研究了2005年从达尼达(Danida)向丹麦非政府组织(NGO)更改的有关信息活动和自身贡献的资助政策。报告询问了为什么改变了这笔资金,何时非政府组织在向公众通报方面起着至关重要的作用,以及对非政府组织的影响。第一次分析探讨了政策变化的背景,研究了在政策中如何识别市场合理性和国家优先事项。这项检查是基于以下发现开始的:援助水平在2001年发生了变化,突然反映了国际援助水平根据意识形态的变化,以及丹麦公众对发展的了解减少的趋势。该分析以描述国际发展政策演变的理论为基础,并以关于国内优先事项在发展政策中的重要性的理论投入为基础,以研究国际和国内意识形态如何影响丹麦的政策。第二项分析考察了非政府组织由于2005年政策而变化的组织结构。通过组织研究的理论以及与丹麦发展非政府组织关键人物的访谈,探讨了市场和国家的影响。必须根据2001年以后总体上给予发展援助的优先顺序较低,面向国内政党的影响以及以市场为基础的日益激烈的竞争是确保非政府组织获得公众舆论的最有效方法的意识形态见解。该报告发现,尽管对非政府组织的公众支持有所增加,但公众对发展的了解却同时下降了。此外,得出的结论是,尽管非政府组织增加了以市场为导向的战略以确保资金投入,但不一定与它们的价值背道而驰。但是,似乎有理由关注政府如何通过新公共管理工具转移市场理性的同时控制非政府组织。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号