首页> 外文OA文献 >Water Access and Poverty Alleviation: Assessing the Feasibility of Private Sector Participation in the Water Sector
【2h】

Water Access and Poverty Alleviation: Assessing the Feasibility of Private Sector Participation in the Water Sector

机译:供水和扶贫:评估私营部门参与水部门的可行性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This report examines the growing involvement of the private sector in water servicesand the ability of private sector participation to improve access to water services forthe poorest citizens, especially in light of the UN Millennium Development Goals.Private Sector Participation (PSP) has been problematic in the area of improvingaccess to water for poor people due to the special nature of water, particularly thedifficulty in reconciling the economic value of the water itself as well as the serviceand the social value of water services. Determining the appropriate role of theregulator after the privatisation agreement goes through has also been the source ofmany problems, as PSP is often implemented in areas with a weak regulatoryenvironment. In addition, in 1992 the concept of Integrated Water ResourceManagement (IWRM) was developed that created a new method of watermanagement that called for a more holistic view of water resources and waterservices. IWRM calls for increased stakeholder participation in the water managementprocess and a recognition of water's ecological and economic value.In order to discuss and analyse PSP in relation to IWRM, two desk studies are used:the first concerns the PSP initiative in Cochabamba Bolivia and the second concernsthe implementation of IWRM in South Africa and the implementation of the policy ofFree Basic Water. The first desk study weights the economic value of water moreheavily than the social value while the second desk study focuses more on the socialvalue, than on the economic value. Four focus areas are identified for the analysis ofthe desk studies that address balancing the social and economic nature of water andassessing the institutional arrangements for water management. They include:extending access to marginal areas, affordability, community participation andtransparency and the role of the regulator. Finally, it is suggested that increasedefforts are needed to address the capacity building needs of local regulatoryauthorities and to assist in the creation of avenues of communication for communityinfluence on water management decisions. The combination of a weak regulatoryenvironment, a well organised utility in an area with little to no stakeholderparticipation will not result in improved access for poor people. Instead, privateutilities and water regulators should attempt to reconcile the economic, social andenvironmental values of water in the privatisation agreement in a way that reflectsthese values and improves access to water services to poor communities.
机译:本报告研究了私营部门对水服务的日益参与,以及私营部门的参与改善最贫困公民获得水服务的能力,特别是根据联合国千年发展目标进行的研究。由于水的特殊性,特别是在调和水本身的经济价值以及水服务的服务和社会价值方面的困难,使贫困人口获得水的领域有所增加。在私有化协议通过后确定监管者的适当角色也是许多问题的根源,因为PSP通常在监管环境薄弱的地区实施。此外,在1992年,开发了水资源综合管理(IWRM)的概念,该概念创造了一种新的水资源管理方法,要求对水资源和水服务进行更全面的了解。 IWRM呼吁利益相关者更多地参与水管理过程,并认识到水的生态和经济价值。为了讨论和分析与IWRM相关的PSP,使用了两个案头研究:第一个涉及Cochabamba玻利维亚的PSP计划,第二个涉及涉及在南非实施IWRM和实施免费基本水政策。第一个案头研究对水的经济价值比社会价值更为重视,而第二个案头研究则更多地关注社会价值,而不是经济价值。确定了四个重点领域,用于对案头研究进行分析,以解决水的社会和经济性质之间的平衡以及评估水管理的体制安排。它们包括:扩大进入边缘地区的机会,可负担性,社区参与和透明度以及监管者的作用。最后,建议需要加大力度来解决地方监管机构的能力建设需求,并协助建立沟通渠道,以使社区对水管理决策产生影响。监管环境薄弱,在利益相关者参与很少甚至没有利益相关者参与的区域中,组织良好的公用事业的结合将不会改善穷人的获取途径。取而代之的是,私人公司和水管理者应尝试以私有化协议中的水的经济,社会和环境价值调和,以反映这些价值并改善贫困社区获得水服务的方式。

著录项

  • 作者

    Friedman Jessica Kate;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号