首页> 外文OA文献 >The Ethics of Artificial Selection and Genetic Modification of Plants
【2h】

The Ethics of Artificial Selection and Genetic Modification of Plants

机译:植物人工选择和遗传修饰的伦理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Artificial selection and genetic modification are both methods which areused to maximize crop profit. The recent years’ development in the geneticengineering sector has made it possible to transfer a specific trait from oneorganism to another. The development has caused a widespread ethicaldebate on the subject. This study examines two different cases based ongenetic modification and artificial selection of plants respectively. The aimof this study is to determine, which ethics participants in the debate useto promote their respective cause. This is achieved by thoroughly analysingthe respective arguments. Based on an analysis and a discussion this studyconcludes that the two methods are similar, seen from an ethical perspective,since both methods use utilitarian and deontology ethical arguments. Basedon the analysis, an ethical basis for assessing genetic modification as moreor less right than artificial selection has not been found. Despite the ethicalsimilarities, the public opinion on the two methods vary significantly, as thescepticism towards genetic modification is far greater than towards artificialselection.
机译:人工选择和基因改造都是用来最大化农作物获利的方法。近年来,由于基因工程领域的发展,可以将一种特质从一种生物转移到另一种生物。这一发展引起了关于该主题的广泛伦理争议。本研究分别基于遗传修饰和人工选择植物来研究两种不同的情况。本研究的目的是确定辩论中哪些伦理参与者用来促进各自的事业。这是通过彻底分析各个论点来实现的。在分析和讨论的基础上,本研究得出结论,从道德的角度来看,这两种方法是相似的,因为这两种方法都使用功利主义和道义学的道德论证。根据分析,尚未找到评估遗传修饰比人工选择具有更多或更少权利的伦理基础。尽管存在伦理上的相似性,但公众对这两种方法的看法却大相径庭,因为对基因修饰的怀疑远大于对人工选择的怀疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号