首页> 外文OA文献 >Credibility of Science Communication: An Exploratory Study of Press Releases in Astronomy
【2h】

Credibility of Science Communication: An Exploratory Study of Press Releases in Astronomy

机译:科学传播的可信度:天文学新闻稿探索性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Twelve qualitative open-ended in-depth interviews with public information officers from large governmental scientific institutions as well as scientists and journalist were conducted in November 2005. An analysis of the interviews is carried out, to study how far science communicators in the name of science communication can, or should, push, without damaging the individual, and thus also the collective credibility, of the science communication community and the involved institutions. Overall the study suggests that a credibility problem for astronomical press releases does not exist. However the interviews indicated a problem within the scientific community, where some lack of understanding and respect among the actors is found. All actors though, showed great attention and concern for communicating science in a credible way. A code of conduct presenting guidelines for how to minimize hype in press releases is presented.
机译:2005年11月,对来自大型政府科学机构的新闻官员以及科学家和记者进行了十二次定性的,不限成员名额的深度访谈。对访谈进行了分析,以研究科学传播者以科学的名义走了多远交流可以或应该推动,而不损害科学传播界和所涉机构的个人,因此也不损害集体信誉。总体而言,该研究表明,天文新闻稿的可信度问题不存在。但是,访谈表明科学界存在一个问题,在这些问题中,参与者之间缺乏理解和尊重。但是,所有演员都对以可靠方式传播科学表示极大的关注和关注。提出了行为准则,提出了有关如何最大程度减少新闻稿中的炒作的准则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号