首页> 外文OA文献 >The Telecom Act of 1996 Requires the FCC to Classify Commercial Internet Access as a Telecommunications Service
【2h】

The Telecom Act of 1996 Requires the FCC to Classify Commercial Internet Access as a Telecommunications Service

机译:1996年的《电信法》要求FCC将商业互联网访问分类为电信服务

摘要

Thousands of papers and comments have been written about what Open Internet policies would best serve the public interest, and thousands more have been written about whether better Open Internet policies could be supported by calling Internet access a telecommunications service under Title II of the Communications Act or an information service. Even the authors of this comment have written about these topics.123 However, this particular comment will address neither of these topics. Instead, it will consider only whether or not commercial Internet access is or is not a telecommunications service under current law. Although many issues are delegated to the FCC as an expert agency, the FCC is still required to follow the laws passed by Congress and signed by the President, and the FCC’s discretion has bounds. In this matter, we find that the Communications Act of 1934 as modified by the Telecommunications Act requires the FCC to define commercial Internet access as a telecommunications service. Opinions will differ as to whether this is a good or bad result for the future of the Internet, but this question is outside the scope of this comment.
机译:关于开放互联网政策最能为公众利益服务的文章和评论已写成千上万,关于通过将互联网接入称为《通信法》第二标题所规定的电信服务是否可以支持更好的开放互联网政策,已经写了成千上万的文章和评论。信息服务。即使是此评论的作者也都写过这些主题。123但是,此特定评论将不会涉及这两个主题。取而代之的是,它将仅根据现行法律考虑商业互联网访问是否是电信服务。尽管许多问题都作为专家机构委托给了FCC,但FCC仍必须遵守国会通过并由总统签署的法律,并且FCC的酌处权是有限的。在此问题上,我们发现根据《电信法》修改的1934年《通信法》要求FCC将商业互联网访问定义为一种电信服务。关于这对Internet的未来是好是坏的结果,意见不一,但是这个问题不在此评论的范围之内。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cherry Barbara; Peha Jon M.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号