首页> 外文OA文献 >Impacts of Responsive Load in PJM: Load Shifting and Real Time Pricing
【2h】

Impacts of Responsive Load in PJM: Load Shifting and Real Time Pricing

机译:响应负载在PJM中的影响:负载转移和实时定价

摘要

Load Shifting and Real Time Pricing Kathleen Spees* and Lester Lave** In PJM, 15% of electric generation capacity ran less than 96 hours, 1.1% of the time, over 2006. If retail prices reflected hourly wholesale market prices, customers would shift consumption away from peak hours and installed capacity could drop. We use PJM data to estimate consumer and producer savings from a change toward real-time pricing (RTP) or time-of-use (TOU) pricing. Surprisingly, neither RTP nor TOU has much effect on average price under plausible short-term consumer responses. Consumer plus producer surplus rises 2.8%-4.4% with RTP and 0.6%-1.0% with TOU. Peak capacity savings are seven times larger with RTP. Peak load drops by 10.4%-17.7% with RTP and only 1.1%-2.4% with TOU. Half of all possible customer savings from load shifting are obtained by shifting only 1.7% of all MWh to another time of day, indicating that only the largest customers need be responsive to get the majority of the short-run savings.
机译:负荷转移和实时定价Kathleen Spees *和Lester Lave **在PJM中,与2006年相比,发电量的15%不到96小时运行,占总运行时间的1.1%。如果零售价格反映了每小时批发市场价格,则客户将转移高峰时段的耗电量和安装容量可能会下降。我们使用PJM数据来估算从实时定价(RTP)或使用时间(TOU)定价变化带来的消费者和生产者节省。令人惊讶的是,在合理的短期消费者反应下,RTP和TOU均对平均价格没有太大影响。 RTP的消费者与生产者盈余分别增长2.8%-4.4%和TOU的0.6%-1.0%。使用RTP可以将峰值容量节省量提高7倍。 RTP的峰值负载下降了10.4%-17.7%,TOU的峰值负载仅下降了1.1%-2.4%。通过仅将全部MWh的1.7%转移到一天中的另一时间来获得所有因负载转移而节省的客户中的一半,这表明只有最大的客户才需要响应以获取大部分的短期节省。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号