首页> 外文OA文献 >Increasing the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Environmental Decisions: Benefit-Cost Analysis and Effluent Fees A Critical Review
【2h】

Increasing the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Environmental Decisions: Benefit-Cost Analysis and Effluent Fees A Critical Review

机译:提高环境决策的效率和有效性:收益成本分析和污水处理费评论

摘要

The objective of this critical review is to evaluate and summarize the literature on economic tools used to improve environmental decision making. Environmental decisions are complicated by pervasive uncertainty, and the lack of consensus on goals and on tradeoffs, such as air versus water pollution and versus loss of coal mining jobs. Five decision frameworks are used by regulatory agencies to simplify decision making. Congress’ choice of a decision framework designates the amount of data and analysis that will be required and the range and depth of social values that must be considered. Economic incentives have worked well for phasing out lead in gasoline, for increasing recycling and for reducing the volume of municipal solid waste. Congress has mandated incentives for acid rain and CFCs, and several countries have implemented carbon taxes to abate greenhouse gas emissions. Economic tools have become more central to the analysis and implementation of environmental policies; their role should continue to increase. We conclude that economic tools are extremely valuable, although their application is difficult.
机译:这次严格审查的目的是评估和总结有关用于改善环境决策的经济工具的文献。环境决策因普遍存在的不确定性而变得复杂,并且在目标和权衡方面缺乏共识,例如空气与水的污染以及煤炭开采工作的丧失。监管机构使用五个决策框架来简化决策。国会对决策框架的选择指定了所需的数据和分析的数量以及必须考虑的社会价值的范围和深度。经济上的激励措施在逐步淘汰汽油中的铅,增加回收利用和减少城市固体废物量方面效果良好。国会已经强制要求对酸雨和氟氯化碳进行奖励,并且有几个国家已经实施了碳税以减少温室气体的排放。经济工具已经成为分析和执行环境政策的中心。他们的作用应继续增加。我们得出的结论是,经济工具虽然很难应用,但却非常有价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号